Modified heat equation in n dimensions

Click For Summary
SUMMARY

The discussion focuses on finding the Green's function for the modified heat equation \( u_t = t \cdot \nabla u \) in n dimensions using scaling arguments. The user initially applies techniques from the regular heat equation, including switching to polar coordinates and leveraging invariance under specific scalings. However, they encounter difficulties when attempting to preserve initial conditions, leading to an ineffective ordinary differential equation (ODE). Suggestions include exploring the generalization of differential operators in n dimensions and considering spherical invariance for easier generalization.

PREREQUISITES
  • Understanding of the modified heat equation and its properties
  • Familiarity with Green's functions in partial differential equations
  • Knowledge of polar coordinates and scaling arguments
  • Basic concepts of differential operators in n dimensions
NEXT STEPS
  • Research the properties of Green's functions for the modified heat equation
  • Study the application of scaling arguments in higher-dimensional PDEs
  • Learn about the Laplace–Beltrami operator and its implications in geometry
  • Explore the concept of spherical invariance in differential equations
USEFUL FOR

Mathematicians, physicists, and researchers working on partial differential equations, particularly those interested in advanced topics like the modified heat equation and its applications in higher dimensions.

nanohumans
Messages
1
Reaction score
0
helloo!

i'm trying to find the Green's function for the modified heat equation $u_t = t * grad(u) $ in n dimensions using scaling arguments. I know how to do this for the regular heat equation, by switching to polar coordinates and noticing that the equation and initial conditions are invariant under the scaling r -> L*r, t-> L^2*t, G -> L^n*G and then letting L = 1/sqrt(t), everything reduces to an ODE which we solve.

I'm trying to do something similar here, i figured it would be easy but the only scaling that I can think of which preserves the initial conditions is r -> r and t -> L*t but this doesn't work, it gives a really dumb ODE since the left hand side goes to zero. I already solved this using Fourier series, the asnwer is basically integrating initial conditions times a Gaussianesque creature and a 1/t^n so i know what to look for, but for now I'm stuck :P

any suggestions? :)
 
Physics news on Phys.org

Similar threads

  • · Replies 4 ·
Replies
4
Views
4K
  • · Replies 6 ·
Replies
6
Views
3K
  • · Replies 2 ·
Replies
2
Views
3K
  • · Replies 3 ·
Replies
3
Views
4K
  • · Replies 6 ·
Replies
6
Views
3K
  • · Replies 1 ·
Replies
1
Views
2K
  • · Replies 6 ·
Replies
6
Views
2K
  • · Replies 1 ·
Replies
1
Views
3K
  • · Replies 7 ·
Replies
7
Views
3K
  • · Replies 2 ·
Replies
2
Views
3K