Modified Mach-Zehnder Interferometer

  • Context: Graduate 
  • Thread starter Thread starter birulami
  • Start date Start date
  • Tags Tags
    Interferometer
Click For Summary
SUMMARY

The discussion centers on the performance of the Mach-Zehnder interferometer, specifically regarding photon detection rates when modifying the setup. When the second beamsplitter is removed, individual photons are detected at approximately 50% efficiency at each detector, as confirmed by existing literature. Removing one detector does not affect the detection rate of the remaining detector, maintaining the 50% detection efficiency. Relevant papers often detail the efficiency of the first beamsplitter in interferometer studies.

PREREQUISITES
  • Understanding of Mach-Zehnder interferometer principles
  • Familiarity with photon counting techniques
  • Knowledge of beamsplitter functionality and efficiency
  • Basic grasp of optical physics, particularly Young's experiments
NEXT STEPS
  • Research photon counting efficiency in interferometers
  • Study the principles of beamsplitter operation and efficiency measurement
  • Examine historical papers on Young's double-slit experiment
  • Explore advanced topics in optical physics related to interferometry
USEFUL FOR

Physicists, optical engineers, and researchers interested in quantum optics and interferometry, particularly those studying photon behavior in experimental setups.

birulami
Messages
153
Reaction score
0
The Mach-Zehnder interferometer is shown in wikipedia and on David Harrison's page.

If the second (upper right) half silvered mirror is taken away and no sample (as in the wikipedia setup) is in any of the two paths, I read that when sending individual photons through the device, roughly 50% of them end up in each detector.

What I would like to know is the following:
  1. Does anyone know a paper where real counts are reported, e.g. like: "we send 100 individual photons, 49 ended up in 1 and 47 ended up in 2, 4 where lost"?
  2. If I further remove one of the detectors, what percentage of photons is registered in the remaining detector? (published counts available?)

Thanks,
Harald.
 
Physics news on Phys.org
1. Removing the second beamsplitter eliminates the interference and just let's the two beams from the first beamsplitter go directly to the detectors. The photon counting you are asking for is done when the efficiency of the first beamsplitter is measured (ignoring the reflectivity of the two mirrors). That is often reported in papers describing interferomters.

2. If 50% goes to each detector, then 50% will still go to the remaining detector. Removing one detector has no effect on what's measured at the other detector.
 
Young's work may be a good starting point.
Mach E., The principles of physics optics
New York - Dover, 1953
 

Similar threads

  • · Replies 33 ·
2
Replies
33
Views
4K
  • · Replies 13 ·
Replies
13
Views
2K
  • · Replies 8 ·
Replies
8
Views
3K
  • · Replies 5 ·
Replies
5
Views
5K
  • · Replies 7 ·
Replies
7
Views
3K
  • · Replies 1 ·
Replies
1
Views
2K
  • · Replies 5 ·
Replies
5
Views
4K
  • · Replies 1 ·
Replies
1
Views
3K
  • · Replies 15 ·
Replies
15
Views
3K
  • · Replies 19 ·
Replies
19
Views
13K