Mach-Zehnder interferometer, but with an entangled beam?

Click For Summary

Discussion Overview

The discussion revolves around the application of a Mach-Zehnder interferometer using entangled photons, exploring the implications of using such a setup on the observed interference patterns. Participants examine whether the presence of an obstacle in one of the paths would still allow for the observation of interference patterns, similar to experiments conducted with coherent light sources.

Discussion Character

  • Exploratory
  • Technical explanation
  • Debate/contested

Main Points Raised

  • Marilyn describes an experiment using a Mach-Zehnder interferometer with entangled photons and questions whether the results would be the same as with a coherent light source.
  • Some participants propose that the presence of a BBO crystal in the path would lead to diffuse results on both screens, with no interference fringes observable, regardless of whether one path is blocked.
  • Marilyn expresses uncertainty about the implications of the BBO crystal and whether it prevents her from observing wave behavior in her own measurements.
  • There is a suggestion that the systematic presence of diffuse patterns in Alice's results may not necessarily prevent Bob from obtaining information about Alice's measurements.
  • Participants discuss the motivations behind conducting such experiments, with Marilyn emphasizing her desire to deepen her understanding of quantum mechanics predictions.

Areas of Agreement / Disagreement

Participants do not reach a consensus on whether the experimental results would differ from those observed with coherent light sources. Multiple competing views remain regarding the effects of the BBO crystal and the implications for interference patterns.

Contextual Notes

Unresolved aspects include the specific conditions under which interference patterns may or may not be observed with entangled photons, as well as the assumptions regarding the measurement capabilities of Alice and Bob.

  • #31
Marilyn67 said:
1/ It seems that a beam of entangled particles carries a message ! This message is "I am entangled".
In other words, trying to create interference by all means without success, with a beam of which we don't know the source would be the signature of an entangled beam, right ?
Although the PDC source is a laser, the entangled beam that comes from the crystal lacks one attribute that is typical of laser light: coherence. Coherence is needed for the interference to appear. You *can* make the light be coherent, but then it will lose some of its entangled properties. To the extent you get more of one attribute, you get less of the other.
 
  • Like
  • Skeptical
Likes   Reactions: Marilyn67, andrewkirk and Hyperfine
Physics news on Phys.org
  • #32
Hello @DrChinese ,

Thank you for your quick response.

Something escapes me:

In 1803, Thomas Young performed his experiment of the two slits with a beam of sunlight and found interference.
A reproduction of the experiment can be seen here as well as the reading of Thomas Young's manuscripts :



I thought sunlight wasn't coherent light, like from an incandescent bulb ?

Cordially,
Marilyn
 
  • #34
Thank you @DrClaude, this discussion is indeed very interesting ! :smile:
 

Similar threads

  • · Replies 17 ·
Replies
17
Views
2K
  • · Replies 2 ·
Replies
2
Views
2K
  • · Replies 1 ·
Replies
1
Views
2K
  • · Replies 28 ·
Replies
28
Views
4K
  • · Replies 30 ·
2
Replies
30
Views
2K
  • · Replies 2 ·
Replies
2
Views
1K
  • · Replies 3 ·
Replies
3
Views
1K
  • · Replies 11 ·
Replies
11
Views
2K
  • · Replies 5 ·
Replies
5
Views
4K
  • · Replies 13 ·
Replies
13
Views
2K