I Mach-Zehnder interferometer, but with an entangled beam?

Click For Summary
The discussion centers on the behavior of a Mach-Zehnder interferometer when using entangled photons instead of a coherent light source. Participants explore whether the presence of an obstacle in one path would still allow for observable interference patterns on Alice's screens, despite the entangled nature of the photons. It is generally agreed that if Alice blocks one path, she will observe a diffuse pattern rather than interference fringes, as the entanglement prevents the observation of interference without combining data from both Alice and Bob. The conversation highlights the complexities of quantum mechanics and the need for further experimentation to clarify these predictions. Ultimately, the consensus leans towards the idea that Alice's observations will differ from those expected with unentangled photons.
  • #31
Marilyn67 said:
1/ It seems that a beam of entangled particles carries a message ! This message is "I am entangled".
In other words, trying to create interference by all means without success, with a beam of which we don't know the source would be the signature of an entangled beam, right ?
Although the PDC source is a laser, the entangled beam that comes from the crystal lacks one attribute that is typical of laser light: coherence. Coherence is needed for the interference to appear. You *can* make the light be coherent, but then it will lose some of its entangled properties. To the extent you get more of one attribute, you get less of the other.
 
  • Like
  • Skeptical
Likes Marilyn67, andrewkirk and Hyperfine
Physics news on Phys.org
  • #32
Hello @DrChinese ,

Thank you for your quick response.

Something escapes me:

In 1803, Thomas Young performed his experiment of the two slits with a beam of sunlight and found interference.
A reproduction of the experiment can be seen here as well as the reading of Thomas Young's manuscripts :



I thought sunlight wasn't coherent light, like from an incandescent bulb ?

Cordially,
Marilyn
 
  • #34
Thank you @DrClaude, this discussion is indeed very interesting ! :smile:
 

Similar threads

  • · Replies 17 ·
Replies
17
Views
1K
Replies
28
Views
4K
  • · Replies 2 ·
Replies
2
Views
2K
Replies
1
Views
2K
  • · Replies 5 ·
Replies
5
Views
4K
  • · Replies 3 ·
Replies
3
Views
1K
  • · Replies 11 ·
Replies
11
Views
2K
  • · Replies 2 ·
Replies
2
Views
1K
  • · Replies 30 ·
2
Replies
30
Views
2K
  • · Replies 13 ·
Replies
13
Views
2K