Undergrad Modular Arithmetic: Find Multiples, Understand the Reason

  • Thread starter Thread starter rashida564
  • Start date Start date
  • Tags Tags
    Arithmetic
Click For Summary
The discussion centers on understanding why certain numbers work as multiples in modular arithmetic, specifically in the context of the equation a^6 ≡ a (mod 6). It highlights the factorization of a^6 - a and the necessity for divisors of 6 to be present in the factors of the equation. The conversation reveals that while the congruence holds for a ≡ 0, 1 (mod 3), it fails for a ≡ 2 (mod 3), leading to the conclusion that numbers of the form a = 3n + 2 do not satisfy the condition. The participants emphasize that factorization is a natural method for exploring these relationships rather than relying solely on trial and error. Overall, the discussion illustrates the interplay between modular arithmetic and factorization in determining valid multiples.
rashida564
Messages
220
Reaction score
7
TL;DR
Find a ∈ Z such that a^6 ≡ a mod 6
Hi everyone, I can find multiple of number for example 2,3,4 and so on. But is there any reason why those number does work.
 
Mathematics news on Phys.org
We have ##6 \,|\,a^6-a=a(a^5-1)=a(a-1)(a^4+a^3+a^2+a+1)##, so the divisors of ##6## must be divisors of the factors on the right. E.g. ##a=3,4## are immediately clear, and ##a=2## is wrong, as ##2^6=64 \equiv 4\not\equiv 2 \operatorname{mod}6\,.##
 
  • Like
Likes jedishrfu
Is it try and error method?
 
Another way to look at it is that your congruence is equivalent to the two simultaneous congruences ##a^6\equiv a \mod 2## and ##a^6\equiv a\mod 3##. The first congruence is always true, and the second is true when ##a\equiv 0,1\mod 3##, but fails when ##a\equiv 2\mod 3##.
 
  • Like
Likes jedishrfu and mfb
rashida564 said:
Is it try and error method?
Where did you see try and error? Factorization to investigate factors is a quite natural thing.

##a^6\equiv a \operatorname{mod} 6 ## is defined as ##6\,|\,a^6-a##, so factoring the polynomial ##a^6-a## is the next thing to do. After that, it becomes clear that ##2\,|\,a^6-6## in any case, as ##a(a-1)\,|\,a^6-a##. So, we are left with what @Infrared has said, the divisor ##3##. We have that ##3## divides ##a(a-1)## iff ##3\,|\,a \Longleftrightarrow a\equiv 0 \operatorname{mod} 3## or ##3\,|\,(a-1) \Longleftrightarrow a\equiv 1\operatorname{mod} 3## because ##3## is prime. Thus we are left with all numbers ##a \equiv 2 \operatorname{mod} 3##, i.e. ##a=3n+2## and ##6\,|\,a^6-a \Longleftrightarrow 3\,|\,a^4+a^3+a^2+a+1## for those numbers. However, if ##a=3n+2## it is easy to see, that ##a^4+a^3+a^2+a+1 =3m+2## which is never divisible by ##3##.
 
  • Like
Likes jedishrfu
I see quicker that ##(3n+2)^6 = 3m + 1## (because I can use ##x^6 = (x^2)^3## ) than I see the same for ##a^4+a^3+a^2+a+1 =3m+2##
 
  • Like
Likes jedishrfu
Here is a little puzzle from the book 100 Geometric Games by Pierre Berloquin. The side of a small square is one meter long and the side of a larger square one and a half meters long. One vertex of the large square is at the center of the small square. The side of the large square cuts two sides of the small square into one- third parts and two-thirds parts. What is the area where the squares overlap?

Similar threads

  • · Replies 13 ·
Replies
13
Views
2K
  • · Replies 35 ·
2
Replies
35
Views
4K
  • · Replies 1 ·
Replies
1
Views
1K
  • · Replies 4 ·
Replies
4
Views
1K
  • · Replies 5 ·
Replies
5
Views
3K
  • · Replies 6 ·
Replies
6
Views
2K
  • · Replies 1 ·
Replies
1
Views
2K
  • · Replies 2 ·
Replies
2
Views
2K
  • · Replies 20 ·
Replies
20
Views
2K
  • · Replies 2 ·
Replies
2
Views
2K