Mole: Avogadro's Number & Its Discovery

  • Context: Undergrad 
  • Thread starter Thread starter akashpandey
  • Start date Start date
  • Tags Tags
    Mole
Join the discussion
Ask a follow-up here, or get your own question answered by working scientists, mathematicians and engineers — people, not an autocomplete.
Real named experts · corrections over time · the nuance an AI answer skips
3 replies · 1K views
akashpandey
Messages
90
Reaction score
4
Why there is
1mole⇒6.022*1023 atom.
Why there is not another number.
How avogrado find that number exactely correct at that time where there was no instuments.
 
Physics news on Phys.org
Avogadro did not find that number, it was only named after him. It's approximate value was first determined by Loschmidt in 1865:
http://books.google.de/books?id=ppEAAAAAYAAJ&pg=PA395#v=onepage&q&f=false
One mole was first defined as the number of atoms in 1g of hydrogen gas. As 1g is a fundamental unit in the cgs system, which is until today the preferred unit system in theoretical physics, this setting seems quite reasonable.
 
But why
1 mole ⇒6.022*1023 atoms is their any derivation for it.
 
It is the definition of the gram which is arbitrary and the number of atoms in one mole is purely empirical. The original definition of the gram was the mass of 1 cubic centimetre of water. At that time (end of the 18th century), one had no idea about the number of molecules that this amount might contain.