Mole Fraction of O2 to Mass of O2

Click For Summary

Discussion Overview

The discussion revolves around calculating the mass of oxygen in a specified enclosure when the mole fraction of oxygen changes. Participants explore the implications of this change under standard temperature and pressure conditions, with a focus on the effects of a fire on oxygen levels.

Discussion Character

  • Exploratory
  • Technical explanation
  • Homework-related

Main Points Raised

  • One participant seeks assistance in calculating the mass of oxygen when the mole fraction is reduced from 0.21 to 0.158 in a 6m x 6m x 6m enclosure.
  • Another participant suggests starting with the assumption of 100% mole fraction and using the ideal gas law to determine the number of moles of oxygen in the enclosure.
  • A different participant clarifies their goal of determining the mass of oxygen after a fire reduces the mole fraction to 75% of its ambient value, indicating a need to understand how long the fire can burn.
  • One participant provides a method to calculate the number of moles of gas in the enclosure based on its volume and the ideal gas law, suggesting a multiplication of the total moles by the relevant mole fractions to find the mass of oxygen.

Areas of Agreement / Disagreement

Participants express varying approaches to the problem, with no consensus on the best method to calculate the mass of oxygen. Some focus on the implications of the fire, while others emphasize the calculations based on the ideal gas law.

Contextual Notes

There are assumptions about the conditions under which the calculations are made, such as the definition of standard temperature and pressure, and the implications of changing mole fractions due to external factors like fire. The discussion does not resolve these assumptions or their impacts on the calculations.

sirchicken
Messages
2
Reaction score
0
Hi Everyone,

I am trying to calculate the mass of oxygen and keep running into dead ends and was wondering if anyone could offer any insight.

I am trying to find the resulting mass of oxygen in a 6m x 6m x 6m enclosure at standard temperature and pressure when the mole fraction of oxygen is reduced from 0.21 to 0.158. Can anybody offer any advice?

Thanks!
 
Chemistry news on Phys.org
What is your specific application, i.e. what is it you are trying to accomplish?

Anyway, I would start by calculating the mass as if the mole fraction were 100%, and use the ideal gas law to calculate how many moles of oxygen would be in the container.

p.s. welcome to PF.
 
I am trying to find out what the mass of the oxygen in the enclosure will be if the mole fraction of oxygen from 0.21 to 0.158.

I am assuming that at stp the mole fraction of oxygen is equal to 0.21 and the mole fraction of nitrogen is 0.79. Then a fire is introduced and reduces the mole fraction of oxygen to 75% of its ambient value. I am trying to calculate the resulting mass of oxygen in the enclosure so that I can determine how long the fire can burn.

Thanks!
 
Okay. Not sure why you want to test this at 32 °F / 0 °C (that's what standard temperature is), rather than at room temperature, but you know more about what you are trying to do than I.

At standard temperature and pressure, 1 mole of an ideal gas occupies 22.4 liters.
You can use google to figure out how many 22.4-liter volumes would be contained in a 6x6x6 m^3 space; just go to google and enter
(6*6*6 m^3) / (22.4 liters)​
That will tell you how many moles of gas molecules (of all kinds) are in the 6x6x6 m3 space.

Multiply the number of moles of gas by the fraction that is oxygen, i.e. 0.21 or 0.158, to get the number of moles of oxygen.

Multiply the number of moles of oxygen by the grams-per-mole for oxygen -- that would be 32 -- and you'll have the mass in grams of oxygen that is in the container.
 

Similar threads

  • · Replies 1 ·
Replies
1
Views
4K
Replies
4
Views
3K
Replies
2
Views
14K
Replies
9
Views
9K
  • · Replies 5 ·
Replies
5
Views
2K
Replies
2
Views
2K
  • · Replies 5 ·
Replies
5
Views
3K
  • · Replies 4 ·
Replies
4
Views
4K
  • · Replies 9 ·
Replies
9
Views
3K
  • · Replies 14 ·
Replies
14
Views
3K