Moment of inertia calculation, factor of radius out?

Click For Summary

Homework Help Overview

The discussion revolves around calculating the moment of inertia for a pulley system with two opposing forces acting on it. The original poster presents a scenario involving a pulley with a specified radius and two tensions, along with a known acceleration.

Discussion Character

  • Exploratory, Conceptual clarification, Mathematical reasoning

Approaches and Questions Raised

  • The original poster attempts to derive the moment of inertia using torque equations and questions why an additional factor of radius appears in their calculations. Other participants explore the relationship between linear and angular acceleration and how they relate to the forces acting on the pulley.

Discussion Status

Participants are actively engaging with the problem, clarifying concepts related to torque, linear and angular acceleration, and the implications of the forces involved. There is a recognition of the need to differentiate between linear and angular quantities, with some guidance provided on the relationships between them.

Contextual Notes

There is an emphasis on understanding the dynamics of the pulley system, including the effects of the applied forces and the resulting motion. The discussion highlights the importance of correctly interpreting the variables involved in the equations of motion.

PhyStan7
Messages
17
Reaction score
0

Homework Statement



Ok i have the following problem. There is a pulley with radius 7.5 cm and 2 forces acting on it (2 tensions of a string) acting in opposite directions either side. One is 18.2N, the other 7.5N. I know the acceleration is 3.75 meteres per second squared.

Find the moment of inertia.

Homework Equations



Change in torque = Ia

The Attempt at a Solution



Ok so the torque of each individual force is r x F (F being the force and r the radius in meters). As the forces are acting perpendicular, the torque of each force is rF.

So i thought the total torque is τ = r(18.2-7.5) = Ia.

So i thought the moment of inertia would equal would equal...

I = [r(18.2-7.5)]/a

However my answer seems to be a factor of r out, i.e the equation [(r^2)(18.2-7.5)]/a sems to yield the correct answer.

Why is this? I do not undersdtand where the extra r comes from which it is multiplied by.

Thanks
 
Physics news on Phys.org
PhyStan7 said:
1. Th

Homework Equations



Change in torque = Ia



What is a?

ehild
 
Sorry a is acceleration
 
Is it perhaps that the forces are implemented in this way? (picture added)

Because then you would have to add the tensions on the pulley, meaning it's going to be:

[itex]t_1+t_2 = a I <=> F_1 R + F_2 R = R (F_1+F_2) = I a[/itex], then check if the result is correct.
 

Attachments

Actually, I just noticed. You do have the acceleration of the points where the forces are applied on the string, because the units are meters/second*second. That means that the pulley is actually turning with a rotational acceleration [itex]a_{rotation} = \frac{a}{R}[/itex]. If you substitute that in the second law for rotational motion you will get the result you want.
 
Ah i think i understand. So the a in the Ia part of the equation refers to angular acceleration but what i had was the linar acceleration (the situation is one weight hanging off a table and the other being pulled along the table, both are moving with acceleration 3.75). I still do not really understand how dividing by the radius gives the angular acceleration though.

Thanks
 
PhyStan7 said:
Ah i think i understand. So the a in the Ia part of the equation refers to angular acceleration but what i had was the linar acceleration (the situation is one weight hanging off a table and the other being pulled along the table, both are moving with acceleration 3.75). I still do not really understand how dividing by the radius gives the angular acceleration though.

Thanks

Yes exactly. The following [itex]a_{center-mass}=a_{angular}*R[/itex] belongs to the theory of my school Physics book. In this situation, you can proove something like it since the string isn't sliding on the pulley. The proof is the following:

Consider a small change of the angle during the angular motion of the pullet [itex]d\theta[/itex]. The string has moved a distance [itex]ds[/itex] and since [itex]s=\theta R[/itex] we have [itex]ds=d(\theta R)=R d\theta[/itex]

By definition, we have [itex]\omega=\frac{d\theta}{dt}[/itex] and [itex]u=\frac{ds}{dt}[/itex],so

[itex]\frac{ds}{dt}=\frac{d\theta}{dt} R \Leftrightarrow a = a_{angular} R[/itex] by differentiating.

I hope I've done everything right :)
 

Similar threads

Replies
3
Views
2K
  • · Replies 13 ·
Replies
13
Views
3K
  • · Replies 40 ·
2
Replies
40
Views
6K
  • · Replies 28 ·
Replies
28
Views
2K
  • · Replies 4 ·
Replies
4
Views
2K
  • · Replies 1 ·
Replies
1
Views
1K
  • · Replies 7 ·
Replies
7
Views
2K
  • · Replies 4 ·
Replies
4
Views
4K
  • · Replies 3 ·
Replies
3
Views
1K
Replies
8
Views
15K