MHB Moment of Inertia: Motor, Shaft Speed & Torque Calculation

Busybee12
Messages
5
Reaction score
0
The rotating parts of a motor have a moment of inertia of 15 kgm^2 and an optimum running speed of 1400 rev/min. When operating the motor is connected at optimum speed , by means of a clutch, to a shaft which has a counter rotation of 600 rev/min. The shaft has a mass of 80 kg and a solid diameter of 1200 mm.

i) Find the common speed of rotation of the two shafts, immediately after slippage has finished.
ii) Determine the change in angular momentum of the motor as the common speed is reached.
iii) Determine the change in angular kinetic energy of the motor as the common speed is reached.
iv) If the motor sends a torque of 220 Nm, find how long it will take for the system to regain optimum running speed for the motor.

I have tried using equations but had no success
 
Mathematics news on Phys.org
Hello and welcome to MHB! :D

Busybee said:
...I have tried using equations but had no success

It would be useful for our helpers to see which equations you used and how you attempted to apply them. Then perhaps it can be found where you may be going astray.
 
Insights auto threads is broken atm, so I'm manually creating these for new Insight articles. In Dirac’s Principles of Quantum Mechanics published in 1930 he introduced a “convenient notation” he referred to as a “delta function” which he treated as a continuum analog to the discrete Kronecker delta. The Kronecker delta is simply the indexed components of the identity operator in matrix algebra Source: https://www.physicsforums.com/insights/what-exactly-is-diracs-delta-function/ by...
Fermat's Last Theorem has long been one of the most famous mathematical problems, and is now one of the most famous theorems. It simply states that the equation $$ a^n+b^n=c^n $$ has no solutions with positive integers if ##n>2.## It was named after Pierre de Fermat (1607-1665). The problem itself stems from the book Arithmetica by Diophantus of Alexandria. It gained popularity because Fermat noted in his copy "Cubum autem in duos cubos, aut quadratoquadratum in duos quadratoquadratos, et...
I'm interested to know whether the equation $$1 = 2 - \frac{1}{2 - \frac{1}{2 - \cdots}}$$ is true or not. It can be shown easily that if the continued fraction converges, it cannot converge to anything else than 1. It seems that if the continued fraction converges, the convergence is very slow. The apparent slowness of the convergence makes it difficult to estimate the presence of true convergence numerically. At the moment I don't know whether this converges or not.
Back
Top