Moment of inertia of a half disk about an axis

Click For Summary
SUMMARY

The discussion focuses on calculating the moment of inertia of a half disk with uniform density about the x-axis. The correct integral setup for the moment of inertia is confirmed to be $$I_{xx}=\int_{0}^{R}\int_{0}^{\pi}(r^2\cos^2{\phi})\rho\,rdrd\phi$$, although an alternative expression using $$\sin^2{\phi}$$ is also presented. Both integrals yield the same result, indicating that the choice of trigonometric function does not affect the outcome. Participants emphasize the importance of consistent angle definitions when discussing the problem.

PREREQUISITES
  • Understanding of moment of inertia concepts
  • Familiarity with polar coordinates and integration
  • Knowledge of trigonometric functions and their properties
  • Basic principles of uniform density in physics
NEXT STEPS
  • Review the derivation of moment of inertia for various shapes
  • Study the properties of trigonometric integrals, particularly $$\sin^2$$ and $$\cos^2$$ functions
  • Explore the application of polar coordinates in physics problems
  • Investigate the implications of angle definitions in rotational dynamics
USEFUL FOR

Students studying physics, particularly those focusing on mechanics and rotational dynamics, as well as educators seeking to clarify concepts related to moment of inertia.

vbrasic
Messages
71
Reaction score
3

Homework Statement


Consider a half disk (of uniform density) with the flat end lying on the x-axis, symmetric about the y-axis (i.e. being cut into two quarters by the y-axis). Calculate the moments of inertia about each of the axes.

Homework Equations


$$I_{rr}=\sum_{i}m_ir_i^2$$

The Attempt at a Solution


I just need some making sure that I'm setting up the problem correctly.

The distance to the x-axis from any point on the disk is ##y##. Or, alternatively, ##r\sin{\phi}.## So we find that, $$I_{xx}=\int_{0}^{R}\int_{0}^{\pi}(r^2\sin^2{\phi})\rho\,rdrd\phi,$$ where ##\rho## is the mass density per unit area. However, my instructor has in his notes that, $$I_{xx}=\int_{0}^{R}\int_{0}^{\pi}(r^2\cos^2{\phi})\rho\,rdrd\phi.$$ I'm not sure why that would be, as the distance from any point to the axis of rotation (x in the case of ##I_{xx}## is ##y=r\sin{\rho}.##
 
Physics news on Phys.org
vbrasic said:

Homework Statement


Consider a half disk (of uniform density) with the flat end lying on the x-axis, symmetric about the y-axis (i.e. being cut into two quarters by the y-axis). Calculate the moments of inertia about each of the axes.

Homework Equations


$$I_{rr}=\sum_{i}m_ir_i^2$$

The Attempt at a Solution


I just need some making sure that I'm setting up the problem correctly.

The distance to the x-axis from any point on the disk is ##y##. Or, alternatively, ##r\sin{\phi}.## So we find that, $$I_{xx}=\int_{0}^{R}\int_{0}^{\pi}(r^2\sin^2{\phi})\rho\,rdrd\phi,$$ where ##\rho## is the mass density per unit area. However, my instructor has in his notes that, $$I_{xx}=\int_{0}^{R}\int_{0}^{\pi}(r^2\cos^2{\phi})\rho\,rdrd\phi.$$ I'm not sure why that would be, as the distance from any point to the axis of rotation (x in the case of ##I_{xx}## is ##y=r\sin{\rho}.##
I think you have it right. Maybe the instructor wrote it down wrong.
 
Have you and your instructor defined angle ##\phi## the same way or is one ##90^o - \phi## of the other?
vbrasic said:
... in the case of ##I_{xx}## is ##y=r \sin \rho##.
You mean ##y=r \sin \phi##.
 
kuruman said:
Have you and your instructor defined angle ##\phi## the same way or is one ##90^o - \phi## of the other?

You mean ##y=r \sin \phi##.

Yes -- and not that I know of.
 
OK, then you need to ask yourself, "does it make any difference?" Is the area under the ##\cos^2(\phi)## curve from ##0## to ##\pi## different from the area under the ##\sin^2(\phi)## curve? Draw the curves and see for yourself.
 
kuruman said:
OK, then you need to ask yourself, "does it make any difference?" Is the area under the ##\cos^2(\phi)## curve from ##0## to ##\pi## different from the area under the ##\sin^2(\phi)## curve? Draw the curves and see for yourself.
Yeah, it wouldn't make a difference. The integral evaluates to the same result either way.
 
vbrasic said:
Yeah, it wouldn't make a difference. The integral evaluates to the same result either way.
Yes, and if you want to satisfy your curiosity, you may have to ask your instructor about the definition of ##\phi##, otherwise leave it alone.
 

Similar threads

Replies
11
Views
3K
  • · Replies 28 ·
Replies
28
Views
2K
  • · Replies 8 ·
Replies
8
Views
2K
  • · Replies 1 ·
Replies
1
Views
2K
Replies
2
Views
2K
  • · Replies 45 ·
2
Replies
45
Views
4K
  • · Replies 3 ·
Replies
3
Views
3K
  • · Replies 11 ·
Replies
11
Views
1K
Replies
8
Views
2K
Replies
52
Views
4K