Moment of inertia of a uniform 2D triangular plate

Click For Summary
SUMMARY

The moment of inertia of a uniform 2D triangular plate is calculated to be 37.8 g cm². The calculation involves integrating horizontal strips of incremental height from y=0 to y=3, with the mass element defined as dm = μ x dy, where μ is the mass density. The discussion highlights the importance of clarifying the limits of integration and the dimensions of the triangular region, specifically addressing the misconception regarding the length of the strips and the values of dm at specific points.

PREREQUISITES
  • Understanding of moment of inertia concepts
  • Familiarity with integration techniques in calculus
  • Knowledge of mass density and its application in physics
  • Basic proficiency in LaTeX for mathematical notation
NEXT STEPS
  • Study the derivation of moment of inertia for various geometric shapes
  • Learn about the application of integration in physics problems
  • Explore advanced LaTeX techniques for presenting mathematical equations
  • Investigate the properties of triangular plates in structural engineering
USEFUL FOR

Students and professionals in physics, engineering, and mathematics, particularly those focusing on mechanics and material properties of shapes.

wcjy
Messages
73
Reaction score
10
Homework Statement
Calculate the moment of inertia of the uniform 2D triangular plate rotating about the x-axis. You are given that the mass per unit area of the plate is μ = 1.4 g/cm2 and that the total mass of the plate is M = 18μ = 25.2 g.
Relevant Equations
I = integrate r^2 dm
1603158811120.png


Answer is 37.8 g cm^2

new to latex
 

Attachments

  • 1603158076858.png
    1603158076858.png
    15 KB · Views: 231
Last edited by a moderator:
Physics news on Phys.org
I agree with your calculation of 3 as the height of the triangle above the x axis. Though it would have been good to explicitly say that you had calculated that result and to have shown the work where you did so.

In the next to last equation you show, you are equating ##dm## with ##(16 - 4y)dy##. Can you justify why at ##y=3##, ##dm## is not equal to zero and why at ##y=0##, ##dm## is not equal to 12?

It would be good to have included a little verbiage such as: "integrating a series of horizontal strips of incremental height ##dy## from ##y=0## at the x-axis to ##y=3## at the top of the triangular region" and "each strip extends from x=4 on the left to x=[insert formula here] on the right".
 
  • Like
Likes   Reactions: wcjy
##x## is not ## 4(4-y)## (the length of each strip that you are considering is not from the origin as the perpendicular side of the triangle is not on the y-axis.)

(using different variable names for the area of the thin strip might make things clear )
 
  • Like
Likes   Reactions: wcjy
jbriggs444 said:
In the next to last equation you show, you are equating dm with (16−4y)dy. Can you justify why at y=3, dm is not equal to zero and why at y=0, dm is not equal to 12?
dm = μ x dy
at y = 3, dm != 0 because μ=1.4 , x = 4 , and dy are all positive integers
at y = 0 dm != 12 because μ=1.4, x= 12. 12*1.4 > 12 so cant?
 
Hamiltonian299792458 said:
##x## is not ## 4(4-y)## (the length of each strip that you are considering is not from the origin as the perpendicular side of the triangle is not on the y-axis.)

(using different variable names for the area of the thin strip might make things clear )
i got the answer thanks so much
 

Similar threads

Replies
25
Views
2K
  • · Replies 11 ·
Replies
11
Views
1K
  • · Replies 40 ·
2
Replies
40
Views
6K
Replies
2
Views
2K
Replies
11
Views
3K
  • · Replies 13 ·
Replies
13
Views
3K
  • · Replies 28 ·
Replies
28
Views
2K
  • · Replies 6 ·
Replies
6
Views
1K
Replies
3
Views
2K
  • · Replies 12 ·
Replies
12
Views
2K