Moment of inertia of a uniform 2D triangular plate

Click For Summary

Homework Help Overview

The discussion revolves around calculating the moment of inertia of a uniform 2D triangular plate, focusing on the geometric and mathematical aspects of the problem.

Discussion Character

  • Exploratory, Conceptual clarification, Mathematical reasoning, Assumption checking

Approaches and Questions Raised

  • Participants examine the calculation of dimensions related to the triangle, including height and the limits of integration. Questions are raised regarding the justification of certain equations and the interpretation of variables used in the calculations.

Discussion Status

The discussion includes attempts to clarify the setup of the problem and the equations involved. Some participants provide guidance on how to approach the integration process, while others question the assumptions made in the calculations. There is no explicit consensus on the correctness of the methods presented.

Contextual Notes

Participants note potential misunderstandings regarding the geometric representation of the triangle and the variables used in the equations. There is mention of the need for clearer definitions and justifications for certain mathematical expressions.

wcjy
Messages
73
Reaction score
10
Homework Statement
Calculate the moment of inertia of the uniform 2D triangular plate rotating about the x-axis. You are given that the mass per unit area of the plate is μ = 1.4 g/cm2 and that the total mass of the plate is M = 18μ = 25.2 g.
Relevant Equations
I = integrate r^2 dm
1603158811120.png


Answer is 37.8 g cm^2

new to latex
 

Attachments

  • 1603158076858.png
    1603158076858.png
    15 KB · Views: 241
Last edited by a moderator:
Physics news on Phys.org
I agree with your calculation of 3 as the height of the triangle above the x axis. Though it would have been good to explicitly say that you had calculated that result and to have shown the work where you did so.

In the next to last equation you show, you are equating ##dm## with ##(16 - 4y)dy##. Can you justify why at ##y=3##, ##dm## is not equal to zero and why at ##y=0##, ##dm## is not equal to 12?

It would be good to have included a little verbiage such as: "integrating a series of horizontal strips of incremental height ##dy## from ##y=0## at the x-axis to ##y=3## at the top of the triangular region" and "each strip extends from x=4 on the left to x=[insert formula here] on the right".
 
  • Like
Likes   Reactions: wcjy
##x## is not ## 4(4-y)## (the length of each strip that you are considering is not from the origin as the perpendicular side of the triangle is not on the y-axis.)

(using different variable names for the area of the thin strip might make things clear )
 
  • Like
Likes   Reactions: wcjy
jbriggs444 said:
In the next to last equation you show, you are equating dm with (16−4y)dy. Can you justify why at y=3, dm is not equal to zero and why at y=0, dm is not equal to 12?
dm = μ x dy
at y = 3, dm != 0 because μ=1.4 , x = 4 , and dy are all positive integers
at y = 0 dm != 12 because μ=1.4, x= 12. 12*1.4 > 12 so cant?
 
Hamiltonian299792458 said:
##x## is not ## 4(4-y)## (the length of each strip that you are considering is not from the origin as the perpendicular side of the triangle is not on the y-axis.)

(using different variable names for the area of the thin strip might make things clear )
i got the answer thanks so much
 

Similar threads

Replies
25
Views
2K
  • · Replies 11 ·
Replies
11
Views
1K
  • · Replies 40 ·
2
Replies
40
Views
6K
Replies
2
Views
2K
Replies
11
Views
4K
  • · Replies 13 ·
Replies
13
Views
3K
  • · Replies 28 ·
Replies
28
Views
2K
  • · Replies 6 ·
Replies
6
Views
1K
Replies
3
Views
2K
  • · Replies 12 ·
Replies
12
Views
2K