Graduate Momentum Energy tensor and Wilson Loop in Yang-Mills Theory

Click For Summary
The discussion centers on the connection between the gauge invariance of the energy-momentum tensor in Yang-Mills theory and the trace of a holonomy, specifically within the context of the Wilson loop. It is established that while the Yang-Mills tensor \( F_{\mu \nu} \) is not gauge invariant, the trace \( Tr(F_{\mu \nu} F^{\mu \nu}) \) is gauge invariant. The conversation also touches on differential geometry concepts, noting that the holonomy \( H(\gamma, D) \) is gauge invariant and relates to the Wilson loop \( W(\gamma, D) \). Additionally, it is highlighted that the curvature tensor is linked to the holonomy through its expansion, indicating that curvature measures holonomy for small loops. The inquiry concludes with a request for clarification on the physical significance of these connections.
CantorsLuck
Messages
1
Reaction score
0
Hello Everyone. I Was Wondering how excatly the Gauge invariance of the trace of the Energy-momentum tensor in Yang-Mills theory connects with the trace of an Holonomy.
To be precise in what I'm asking:
The Yang-Mills Tensor is defined as:

$$F_{\mu \nu} (x) = \partial_{\mu} B_{\nu}(x)- \partial_{\nu} B_{\mu} (x) -ig[B_{\mu} , B_{\nu}]$$
Where ##-\frac{1}{-ig}[B_{\mu} , B_{\nu}] = F_{\mu \nu}##
If now I define a covariant derivative as follows: ##D_{\mu}=1_{2x2} \partial_{\mu} - igB_{\mu}##
where $$B_{\mu}=\frac{\sigma}{2} \beta_{\mu}$$

such that
##D_{\mu} \psi \rightarrow D'_{\mu} \psi ' = \sigma \psi \sigma^{-1}##, so ##D_{\mu}= \sigma D_{\mu} \sigma^{-1}## (1)
Applying this to ##F_{\mu \nu}## :
$$=-\frac{1}{-ig}[\sigma D_{\mu} \sigma^{-1} , \sigma D_{\nu} \sigma^{-1} ]$$
$$=-\frac{1}{-ig}(\sigma D_{\mu} \sigma^{-1} \sigma D_{\mu} \sigma^{-1} - \sigma D_{\mu} \sigma^{-1} \sigma D_{\mu} \sigma^{-1})$$
$$=-\frac{1}{-ig} \sigma [D_{\mu} , D_{\nu}] \sigma^{-1} = \sigma F_{\mu \nu} \sigma^{-1} \neq F_{\mu \nu}$$
Therefore ##F_{\mu \nu}## in not Gauge invariant.
Now, if I Consider the ##Tr(F_{\mu \nu} F^{\mu \nu})## and apply relation (1)

$$Tr(\sigma F_{\mu \nu} \sigma^{-1} \sigma F^{\mu \nu} \sigma^{-1})= Tr(\sigma F_{\mu \nu} F^{\mu \nu} \sigma^{-1}) = Tr(F_{\mu \nu} F^{\mu \nu})$$
So, the ##Tr(F_{\mu \nu} F^{\mu \nu})## is indeed gauge invariant.

Now Let's review some differential geometry concepts:

Lets consider a manifold ##M##, a Vector Bundle ##E## with a connection ##D## and a smooth path ##\gamma## that connects two points in the manifold, let's say ##p## and ##q## . We know that we can define a holonomy $$H(\gamma , D): E_{p} \rightarrow E_{q}$$

and let's remember that ##Tr(H(\gamma , D))## is gauge invariant. We think the ##Tr(H(\gamma , D))## as a Holonomy over a loop, and this loop is called the Wilson Loop. $$W(\gamma , D) = Tr(H(\gamma , D))$$

So my question is how exactly the energy-momentum tensor in Yang-Mills theory connects with the Wilson loop and what's the physical significance of this?

Thanks!
 
Last edited:
Physics news on Phys.org
That's the curvature tensor, not the energy momentum tensor, just to let you know.

The relation between the holonomy and the curvature tensor is that if you expand the holonomy in the size of the curve, then the curvature tensor is the coefficient of the first term.

Physically the curvature then measures the Holonomy for small loops.

On my phone, I'll post something more detailed tomorrow.
 
  • Like
Likes dextercioby and nrqed
Time reversal invariant Hamiltonians must satisfy ##[H,\Theta]=0## where ##\Theta## is time reversal operator. However, in some texts (for example see Many-body Quantum Theory in Condensed Matter Physics an introduction, HENRIK BRUUS and KARSTEN FLENSBERG, Corrected version: 14 January 2016, section 7.1.4) the time reversal invariant condition is introduced as ##H=H^*##. How these two conditions are identical?

Similar threads

  • · Replies 24 ·
Replies
24
Views
3K
  • · Replies 3 ·
Replies
3
Views
2K
  • · Replies 13 ·
Replies
13
Views
4K
  • · Replies 7 ·
Replies
7
Views
4K
  • · Replies 2 ·
Replies
2
Views
2K
  • · Replies 17 ·
Replies
17
Views
2K
  • · Replies 14 ·
Replies
14
Views
3K
  • · Replies 2 ·
Replies
2
Views
1K
  • · Replies 1 ·
Replies
1
Views
2K
  • · Replies 3 ·
Replies
3
Views
5K