Momentum in Galilean transformation

Click For Summary

Homework Help Overview

The discussion revolves around demonstrating that the definition of linear momentum, p=mv, retains the same form, p'=mv', under a Galilean transformation. Participants are exploring the implications of this transformation in the context of classical mechanics.

Discussion Character

  • Conceptual clarification, Assumption checking, Mathematical reasoning

Approaches and Questions Raised

  • Participants are attempting to understand how to apply the Galilean transformation to momentum and what it means for momentum to be invariant under this transformation. Questions about the velocity transformation and its implications for momentum are raised, along with clarifications on the meaning of primed and unprimed quantities.

Discussion Status

The discussion is active, with participants providing insights and clarifications regarding the transformation of momentum. Some guidance has been offered on the relationship between velocities in different frames, and there is an exploration of the implications of these transformations for the laws of physics.

Contextual Notes

Participants are working within the constraints of classical mechanics and are discussing the definitions and transformations relevant to momentum without explicit consensus on all points. There is a focus on understanding the definitions and relationships between different reference frames.

Pengwuino
Gold Member
Messages
5,112
Reaction score
20
I need to show that the definition of linear momentum p=mv, has the same form p'=mv' under a Galilean transformation. What does it mean to "show" such a thing? I have no idea where to start :(
 
Physics news on Phys.org
It means that you have to apply the Galileo transformation to your momentum p and end up with p' in your transformated system.
 
How would I go about doing that...
 
Say you have a primed system moving with a velocity v_0 relative to your unprimed system. What is the Galileo transformation then? What does that tell you about the velocity transformation? The mass m is a constant, so what does that tell you about the momentum?
 
Last edited:
I'm not sure what the velocity transformation is. I know x'=x-vt but i don't konw where to go from there if that's even the right place to start.
 
It is. Recall that x=x(t), now what do you get when you apply d/dt to it?
 
Ok my professor gave me a little and I got here…

\begin{array}{l}<br /> x&#039; = x - ut \\ <br /> p = mv \\ <br /> p = m\frac{d}{{dt}}(x&#039; + ut) \\ <br /> p = m(v&#039; + u) \\ <br /> p = mv&#039; + mu \\ <br /> p = p&#039; + mu \\ <br /> \end{array}

So what exactly does this tell me? What does p' mean in actuality? If K is the stationary frame, is it the momentum as seen by the person in the reference frame K'? And is p simply the momentum from the K frame?
 
To answer your questions: yes and yes.

What you are trying to show is that if a person in the K frame sees an object with momentum p = mv, where v is the velocity of the object in the K frame, then will a person in the K' frame see the object as having a moment p' = mv', where v' is the object's velocity as measured in the K' frame? If he doesn't, then the laws of physics (specifically the equation for momentum) are not *invariant* under a Galilean transformation. But it turns out they are.:

If the object has velocity v = dx/dt in K, then in K' its velocity is dx'/dt = d(x - ut)/dt = dx/dt - u = v - u. So we have established that v' = v - u in a Galilean transformation.

And since in your result you got p' = m(v-u) = mv', you know you're ok.
 
So p is the momentum in the rest frame? And is the p' the momentum as seen from the K' frame?
 
  • #10
Pengwuino said:
So p is the momentum in the rest frame? And is the p' the momentum as seen from the K' frame?

cepheid said:
To answer your questions: yes and yes.

Umm...the notation does seem pretty unambiguous to me. Primed quantities are measured relative to the primed coordinate system. Unprimed quantities are measured relative to the unprimed coordinate system.
 

Similar threads

  • · Replies 4 ·
Replies
4
Views
2K
  • · Replies 25 ·
Replies
25
Views
3K
  • · Replies 7 ·
Replies
7
Views
4K
  • · Replies 29 ·
Replies
29
Views
3K
  • · Replies 2 ·
Replies
2
Views
2K
  • · Replies 35 ·
2
Replies
35
Views
5K
  • · Replies 14 ·
Replies
14
Views
2K
  • · Replies 9 ·
Replies
9
Views
2K
  • · Replies 3 ·
Replies
3
Views
3K
  • · Replies 1 ·
Replies
1
Views
12K