A Momentum operator -- Why do we use the plane wave solution?

Click For Summary
The discussion centers on the significance of using plane wave solutions to derive the quantum mechanical momentum operator and their importance in field theory and particle physics. Participants express a desire for deeper insights into the fundamental reasons behind the preference for plane waves, beyond their mathematical convenience and ability to represent fields as superpositions of harmonic oscillators. There is a recognition that while plane waves yield analytically solvable problems, the underlying principles may lack sufficient structure for some. A modern approach is suggested, focusing on the Lie algebra of Galilean transformations to derive momentum operators. Overall, the conversation seeks to bridge the gap between practical applications and foundational understanding in quantum mechanics.
zb23
Messages
27
Reaction score
2
Why in order to derive the QM momentum operator we use the plane wave solution. Why later on in field theory and particle physics, the plane wave ansatz is so physically important?
 
Physics news on Phys.org
Because we can write any field in qft as a superposition of plane waves.
 
Yes, I agree, but still, is there some deeper meaning behind plane waves? Is it "just" most physically appropriate?
 
I think that it is quite nice tool when we can decompose any field into a set of harmonic oscillators. One of the reasons is that we can solve the harmonic oscillator problem in QM completely analytically. No perturbation theory or variations or any numerical method.
 
Yes, I understand that but aren't the things you said just consequences? It is like it bothers me in some fundamental QM way. I mean I can't be satisfied with the argument that it gives nice solutions. I mean, it is obviously correct considering the experiments in QM.
 
zb23 said:
I mean I can't be satisfied with the argument that it gives nice solutions.
That's the main basis for mathematical physics. Why represent force as a vector? Why is time a parameter in non-relativistic physics? Why have a spacetime manifold in relativity?
 
  • Like
Likes mattt and simonjech
Of course, I understand, I mean I am currently doing field theory in particle physics and some arguments for plane wave solutions, for me, lack some structure, therefore I asked...I just wanted to get some more insight into some basics...
 
zb23 said:
some arguments for plane wave solutions, for me, lack some structure
Can you give some specfic references to arguments that you find lacking?
 
zb23 said:
Why in order to derive the QM momentum operator we use the plane wave solution.
You don't have to do it in that old-fashioned way.

A more modern approach is to examine the Lie algebra of Galilean transformations as an abstract group. Then, representing that algebra in coordinate representation, implies that the operator of spatial translation, (##P_i = -i \hbar \partial_i##), must satisfy ##P = MV## (for a free particle), which is the usual expression for momentum.

For a detailed exposition of this, see Ballentine chapters 3 and 4.
 
  • Like
  • Informative
Likes zb23, Nugatory, vanhees71 and 2 others

Similar threads

  • · Replies 8 ·
Replies
8
Views
548
Replies
32
Views
3K
  • · Replies 39 ·
2
Replies
39
Views
957
Replies
75
Views
5K
  • · Replies 9 ·
Replies
9
Views
2K
Replies
5
Views
2K
  • · Replies 12 ·
Replies
12
Views
12K
Replies
3
Views
3K
  • · Replies 17 ·
Replies
17
Views
2K
  • · Replies 2 ·
Replies
2
Views
2K