Monty Hall Problem -- Questions

  • Context: Undergrad 
  • Thread starter Thread starter Jeffdef
  • Start date Start date
  • Tags Tags
    Monty hall
Click For Summary
SUMMARY

The Monty Hall problem illustrates the counterintuitive nature of probability, specifically that switching doors after one is revealed increases the chance of winning from 1/3 to 2/3. Participants debated the implications of randomness in both the game and real-life scenarios, emphasizing that while the initial choice has a 1/3 chance of being correct, the act of revealing a goat alters the probabilities. The discussion highlighted the importance of understanding uniform randomness and how biases in choice do not affect the underlying probabilities of the game.

PREREQUISITES
  • Understanding of basic probability theory
  • Familiarity with the Monty Hall problem
  • Knowledge of uniform randomness in statistical analysis
  • Ability to differentiate between probability and observed frequency
NEXT STEPS
  • Study the mathematical foundations of the Monty Hall problem
  • Explore concepts of uniform vs. non-uniform randomness
  • Learn about Bayesian probability and its applications
  • Investigate real-world applications of probability theory in decision-making
USEFUL FOR

Mathematicians, statisticians, educators, and anyone interested in probability theory and its real-world implications will benefit from this discussion.

  • #31
WWGD said:
So you believe you can conceive every single possible correct solution?
No.

To defend that statement, which I thought I did pretty clearly, all I need to "conceive of" is one. By definition, to be "correct" another other solution must ultimately arrive at the same correct answer,1/(1+Q). If the contestant has no knowledge of where the car is, this is the most general, and correct, answer. Another solution can't both be correct, and get a different answer. (Note that 1/(1+Q) includes the less general, but correct, assumption that Q=1/2 so the probability is 2/3.)

Otherwise, we'd really have a paradox. So maybe you should go back to your imaginary world where mathematics doesn't have to be consistent.
 

Similar threads

  • · Replies 12 ·
Replies
12
Views
3K
  • · Replies 53 ·
2
Replies
53
Views
3K
  • · Replies 7 ·
Replies
7
Views
2K
  • · Replies 9 ·
Replies
9
Views
3K
  • · Replies 6 ·
Replies
6
Views
3K
  • · Replies 212 ·
8
Replies
212
Views
16K
  • · Replies 2 ·
Replies
2
Views
2K
  • · Replies 21 ·
Replies
21
Views
15K
  • · Replies 4 ·
Replies
4
Views
3K
  • · Replies 15 ·
Replies
15
Views
2K