I Monumental Proof Settles Geometric Langlands Conjecture

  • I
  • Thread starter Thread starter Astronuc
  • Start date Start date
  • Tags Tags
    Conjecture Proof
AI Thread Summary
A group of nine mathematicians has successfully proved the geometric Langlands conjecture, a significant milestone in modern mathematics that connects number theory, geometry, and function fields. This proof, spanning over 800 pages across five papers, culminates three decades of research and was led by Dennis Gaitsgory and Sam Raskin. The Langlands program, initiated by Robert Langlands in the 1960s, serves as a foundational framework for understanding complex mathematical relationships. Experts anticipate that the new findings will foster collaboration between researchers in geometry and number theory, enhancing the exchange of ideas. The achievement is viewed as a monumental step forward in the field of mathematics.
Astronuc
Staff Emeritus
Science Advisor
Gold Member
Messages
22,361
Reaction score
7,192
group of nine mathematicians has proved the geometric Langlands conjecture, a key component of one of the most sweeping paradigms in modern mathematics.

The proof represents the culmination of three decades of effort, said Peter Scholze, a prominent mathematician at the Max Planck Institute for Mathematics who was not involved in the proof. “It’s wonderful to see it resolved.”

The Langlands program, originated by Robert Langlands in the 1960s, is a vast generalization of Fourier analysis, a far-reaching framework in which complex waves are expressed in terms of smoothly oscillating sine waves. The Langlands program holds sway in three separate areas of mathematics: number theory, geometry and something called function fields. These three settings are connected by a web of analogies commonly called mathematics’ Rosetta stone.
https://www.quantamagazine.org/monumental-proof-settles-geometric-langlands-conjecture-20240719

The proof involves more than 800 pages spread over five papers. It was written by a team led by Dennis Gaitsgory (Scholze’s colleague at the Max Planck Institute) and Sam Raskin of Yale University.

https://people.mpim-bonn.mpg.de/gaitsgde/GLC/

https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Langlands_program

https://www.quantamagazine.org/what-is-the-langlands-program-20220601/

https://www.ias.edu/ideas/modern-mathematics-and-langlands-program

From the Quanta Magazine article
Now that the geometric Langlands researchers finally have their lengthy proof down on paper, Caraiani hopes they will have more time to talk to researchers on the number theory side. “It’s people who have very different ways of thinking about things, and there’s always a benefit if they manage to slow down and talk to each other and see the other’s perspective,” she said. It’s only a matter of time, she predicted, before the ideas from the new work permeate number theory.

As Ben-Zvi put it, “These results are so robust that once you get started, it’s hard to stop.”
 
Mathematics news on Phys.org
Wow, this is pretty monumental. It's like trying to span the Grand Canyon: You have half of the bridge across it built and now need to build the other connecting half.
 
Thread 'Video on imaginary numbers and some queries'
Hi, I was watching the following video. I found some points confusing. Could you please help me to understand the gaps? Thanks, in advance! Question 1: Around 4:22, the video says the following. So for those mathematicians, negative numbers didn't exist. You could subtract, that is find the difference between two positive quantities, but you couldn't have a negative answer or negative coefficients. Mathematicians were so averse to negative numbers that there was no single quadratic...
Insights auto threads is broken atm, so I'm manually creating these for new Insight articles. In Dirac’s Principles of Quantum Mechanics published in 1930 he introduced a “convenient notation” he referred to as a “delta function” which he treated as a continuum analog to the discrete Kronecker delta. The Kronecker delta is simply the indexed components of the identity operator in matrix algebra Source: https://www.physicsforums.com/insights/what-exactly-is-diracs-delta-function/ by...
Thread 'Unit Circle Double Angle Derivations'
Here I made a terrible mistake of assuming this to be an equilateral triangle and set 2sinx=1 => x=pi/6. Although this did derive the double angle formulas it also led into a terrible mess trying to find all the combinations of sides. I must have been tired and just assumed 6x=180 and 2sinx=1. By that time, I was so mindset that I nearly scolded a person for even saying 90-x. I wonder if this is a case of biased observation that seeks to dis credit me like Jesus of Nazareth since in reality...
Back
Top