Moon Connected to Earth: What Happens Next?

  • Context: High School 
  • Thread starter Thread starter shaden
  • Start date Start date
  • Tags Tags
    Earth Moon
Click For Summary

Discussion Overview

The discussion explores the hypothetical scenario of connecting a rope from the Moon to Earth, examining the implications of such a connection on the rope's behavior and the gravitational dynamics involved. Participants delve into concepts related to orbital mechanics, Lagrange points, and the feasibility of constructing a lunar beanstalk or space elevator.

Discussion Character

  • Exploratory
  • Technical explanation
  • Mathematical reasoning
  • Debate/contested

Main Points Raised

  • One participant suggests that the rope would dangle above the ground, moving across the sky as the Moon drags it along due to Earth's stronger gravity.
  • Another participant proposes that the rope might form a spiral shape, referencing the Moon's orbital mechanics and the concept of a moon-o-static orbit.
  • Some participants discuss the implications of the Moon's slow rotation and elliptical orbit on the feasibility of a space elevator, suggesting that a beanstalk through the L1 Lagrange point could be practical.
  • There are calculations presented regarding the moon-o-static distance and the gravitational balance between the Earth and the Moon, with varying results and methods of calculation.
  • Participants express uncertainty about the exact shape and dynamics of the rope, particularly when considering different lengths and gravitational influences.
  • One participant shares a formula for calculating the location of Lagrange points and discusses the stability of such points in relation to the masses of the Earth and Moon.
  • Several participants engage in detailed calculations regarding the gravitational forces and orbital parameters, leading to differing conclusions about the distances involved.

Areas of Agreement / Disagreement

Participants do not reach a consensus on the behavior of the rope or the feasibility of the proposed concepts. Multiple competing views and calculations are presented, indicating ongoing uncertainty and exploration of the topic.

Contextual Notes

Participants express limitations in their calculations and assumptions, particularly regarding the gravitational parameters and the dynamics of the Moon's orbit. There are unresolved mathematical steps and varying interpretations of the data presented.

shaden
Messages
2
Reaction score
0
Imagine that we go to the moon, and tie one end of a rope to the surface of the moon, and then take the other end of the rope back to earth. We can't tie it down of course, because it would snap as the moon moves away. So instead we make the rope long enough to be a few feet off the ground, and let it go.

What happens next?

Since the gravity of Earth is stronger, I assume the rope would just dangle above the ground, although moving across the sky as the moon drags it along.

The foundation on the moon might have to be very strong to hold the rope, because the moon is pulling one way, and Earth the other.
 
Astronomy news on Phys.org
Hello shaden
My intuitive answer is that the rope will make some sort of spiral. I never calculated the moon-o-statistical orbit. I know that for the Earth that is 26000 km. So a satelite further away moves slower than the Earth surface and a satelite closer moves faster. The moon moves around one time each month (it literally faces the earth). The center of the Earth moon system lies within the earth. 3800 km of the centre. If you take the distance of the moon d_ME= 1 1/3 lightsecond, then I think there is enough data to calculate the moon-o-statistical orbit.
A rope shorter than the ...-o-statistical orbit moves to slow to leave it upright, yet a rope reaching beyond the o-statistical orbit moves fast enough to centrifugate more than then the gravitational pull. I am still not certain what would become the shape of a rope let us say twice as large as the moon-o-statistical orbit...
greetings JanM
 
JANm said:
If you take the distance of the moon d_ME= 1 1/3 lightsecond, then I think there is enough data to calculate the moon-o-statistical orbit.
A rope shorter than the ...-o-statistical orbit moves to slow to leave it upright, yet a rope reaching beyond the o-statistical orbit moves fast enough to centrifugate more than then the gravitational pull. I am still not certain what would become the shape of a rope let us say twice as large as the moon-o-statistical orbit...
greetings JanM

The moon rotates too slowly for a traditional! space elevator to work. However, a rope through either the L1 or L3 Lagrange point is quite practical. Since the rope/beanstalk/skyhook would be much shorter than on Earth, and subject to 1/6 the gravity, even more conventional materials than carbon nanotubes can be used. For example, such a space elevator made of Kevlar would only take a few shuttle loads to set up.

The two tricky parts are the moon's libration, and that its orbit around the Earth is elliptical. For a skyhook through the L1 point, the latter can be dealt with by making it longer than necessary and anchoring it well on the moon's surface. But this is where the libration comes in. Since the moon has libration in both latitude and longitude, connecting the beanstalk to a track wouldn't work. Besides, the track would take a lot more construction materials, and work, than the beanstalk itself. A simple solution is to use the beanstalk to lift the anchor on the moon, use the pendulum effect to sway the anchor past the sub-Earth point, then put it down again. Seems complicated, but it is probably the easiest way to make a lunar beanstalk work.

Note also that any plans for visiting Mars without setting up a beanstalk are silly. The weight of cable needed is small compared to any Mars lander/orbiter, and Deimos provides a useful anchor. Again, a beanstalk dropped from Deimos, would not remain above any particular point on the Martian surface. For exploring, this is good--you can drop exploration teams anywhere along the Martian equator and recover them a few days later.
 
Hello Eachus
Ok the term beanstalk is nice and you mention the L_1 point where Earth gravitation is equal to the moon gravitation. Am I correct with this Lagrange_1 point?
Still I try to find d_ms (moon-o-static distance) take object x:

1 GMm/d_xs^2=mv^2/d_xs

dividing left and right by m, because a brick and a feather fall equally in vacuum.
dividing left and right by d_xs because v/dxs is omega

you get 1b GM/d_xs^3=omega^2,so d_xs=(GM/omega^2)^1/3.
so d_es=26000=(GM_earth/day^2)

We know omega_moon, so we need to know GM_moon:
GM_moon*400000=GM_earth*3800 so GM_moon=38*GM_earth/4000, approx hundredst of earthmass...

d_ms=26000*38/(900*4000)=1,3*1,9/9=300 meter, indeed rotation of the moon is too slow to have a moonstationary orbit.

This was not what I expected to be...
greetings Janm
 
Hello
Sorry I forgot the 1/3 power. So actual d_ms=(1,3*1,9/9)^(1/3)=0,27^(1/3)=0,65, so 650meter nevertheless too small to be important.

I am interested in the distance from the moon where gravity of the moon is equal to that of the earth. The turning point as they say...
greetings
 
Hello
My reply is still no good. I guess my takeoff was too fast.
d_ms=d_es*((GM_m/Omega_m^2)/(GM_e/Omega_e^2))^(1/3)
So much for a field mathematic...
d_ms=26000*(38/(4000*900))^(1/3)
=26000*(10,5/1000.000)^(1/3)=520 KM
Still small but a more realistic answer. Now we need the radius of the moon at least...
Greetings Janm
 
pervect said:
It's got some formulas for the location of the Lagrange points that are good to the first order in the mass ratio, though the bulk of the paper is concerned with the analysis of stability.

Thank you for this article. Indeed L1 is the point in between. I see L1=R(1-(alpha/3)^(1/3))
with alpha = M_m/(M_m+M_m)=1/100, R=1 1/3 lightsec it becomes
L1=1 1/3(1-(1/300)^(1/3))=4/3(1-11/75)=1,15, so 55.000 km of the moon, and 245.000 km of the earth.
The moon o static is still not good I used omega_moon=30 while it should be 1/30...
greetings Janm
 
Hello
Found some data:
Moon: M_m=7,353E22kg, P_m=27,4day, R_m=1738km
Earth: M_e=5,976E24kg, P_e=23,96hour, R_e=6378km
their mean distance d=384,4E3km, G=6,6726E-11Nm^2/kg^2.
Hope this will help for calculating length of cord and
Earth-o-static radius
Langrange-point1
Moon-o-static radius
greetings Janm
 
  • #10
Hello All
It is becoming a little of a monologe. I have calculated the moon-o-static satellite radius:
GMm/r^2=mv^2/r (1)
Deviding (1) by mr one gets:
GM/r^3=v^2/r^2=w^2 (2)
muliply (2) with r^3/w^2 and powering to 1/3 one gets:
r=(GM/w^2)^(1/3)
r is static satelite-radius
G=2/3E-10, M=mass moon=22/3E22, w=angular velocity=3/82day^-1=4E-7sec-1
and after calculating r=330E6 km.
This is very near to the distance Earth moon: d=384E6 km
greetings Janm
 

Similar threads

  • · Replies 4 ·
Replies
4
Views
3K
  • · Replies 16 ·
Replies
16
Views
5K
  • · Replies 33 ·
2
Replies
33
Views
5K
  • · Replies 5 ·
Replies
5
Views
2K
  • · Replies 10 ·
Replies
10
Views
5K
  • · Replies 18 ·
Replies
18
Views
3K
  • · Replies 15 ·
Replies
15
Views
3K
  • · Replies 5 ·
Replies
5
Views
7K
  • · Replies 1 ·
Replies
1
Views
2K
  • · Replies 30 ·
2
Replies
30
Views
5K