Morse-witten cohomology for non-orientable target spaces

  • Context: Graduate 
  • Thread starter Thread starter electroweak
  • Start date Start date
Click For Summary
SUMMARY

This discussion focuses on the challenges of defining Morse homology for non-orientable spaces, specifically the Klein bottle and the projective plane. The participants reference "Mirror Symmetry" by Hori et al. and Milnor's Morse Theory, emphasizing the necessity of embedding smooth manifolds in Euclidean space to establish Morse functions. The conversation highlights attempts to identify Morse functions for the Klein bottle and the projective plane, with particular attention to the height function and distance functions derived from immersions. The conclusion suggests that while certain functions may appear to be Morse functions, critical points and their configurations need careful consideration.

PREREQUISITES
  • Morse Theory fundamentals, particularly as outlined in Milnor's "Morse Theory"
  • Understanding of non-orientable manifolds, specifically the Klein bottle and projective plane
  • Familiarity with embedding and immersion concepts in differential geometry
  • Knowledge of critical points and their significance in the context of Morse functions
NEXT STEPS
  • Research the properties of Morse functions on non-orientable manifolds
  • Study the implications of Sard's Theorem in the context of Morse Theory
  • Explore examples of Morse functions for the Klein bottle and projective plane
  • Investigate the relationship between distance functions and critical points in immersed manifolds
USEFUL FOR

Mathematicians, particularly those specializing in topology and differential geometry, as well as students and researchers interested in Morse Theory and its applications to non-orientable spaces.

electroweak
Messages
43
Reaction score
1
I'm reading "Mirror Symmetry" by Hori et al. In it, they compute the cohomology groups for the sphere and the torus. I tried to do the same for the Klein bottle, and it isn't working out.

Is Morse homology defined for non-orientable spaces? If not, why not? Can it be extended?
 
Physics news on Phys.org
There is a theorem that any compact manifold possesses a Morse function. The proof in Milnor's Morse Theory relies on the ability to embed any smooth manifold in Euclidean space and then proving - using Sard's Theorem - that the distance function from the points in the manifold to some fixed point in Euclidean space has no degenerate critical points.

Before I thought I had an explicit example of Morse function for the Klein bottle but on further thought the function seemed to have an entire circle of critical points. I would like to see a Morse function for the Klein bottle and also for the projective plane.
 
Last edited:
Consider the height function on the image of some nice immersion of the Klein Bottle in R3. Pullback the height function by the immersion to obtain a potential on the actual Klein Bottle.

Is this a Morse function? If so, I can't get it to work. If not, why isn't it?
 
I think the same arguments that work for embeddings also work for immersions. For an immersed Klein bottle in 3 space the distance function to most points - except for a set of measure zero - will be a Morse function. I am not sure about the height function.

Here is another thought.

Take a rectangle - not a square - in the plane and make a flat Klein bottle by pasting the opposite sides to each other. It seems that the function that measures the Euclidean distance to the center of the rectangle is a Morse function. This also works on a flat torus. I was confused since there is one maximum and minimum and two saddle point in each but I guess the cell attaching maps are different.
 
I should have said but I think you already knew this that the distance function for an immersion has to follow the surface and not switch at intersections.
 
Here is a thought for the projective plane. Each point in the plane has two inverse images in the 2 sphere each either lying on the equator or one in the northern and the other its antipode in the southern hemisphere. The function will be the distance of the point in the northern hemisphere to the north pole. For points along the equator, it is also the distance to the north pole. This seems to be a Morse function with one critical point - which is correct since its Euler characteristic is 1.
 

Similar threads

  • · Replies 21 ·
Replies
21
Views
4K
  • · Replies 1 ·
Replies
1
Views
2K
  • · Replies 38 ·
2
Replies
38
Views
7K
  • · Replies 2 ·
Replies
2
Views
3K
  • · Replies 21 ·
Replies
21
Views
6K
  • · Replies 28 ·
Replies
28
Views
3K
  • · Replies 21 ·
Replies
21
Views
26K
  • · Replies 87 ·
3
Replies
87
Views
8K
  • · Replies 8 ·
Replies
8
Views
3K
  • Poll Poll
  • · Replies 15 ·
Replies
15
Views
21K