Most Generalized Lensmaker's Equation

  • Thread starter Thread starter TaylorRiles
  • Start date Start date
  • Tags Tags
    generalized
Click For Summary
SUMMARY

The discussion focuses on solving a lens and mirror problem involving a glass sphere with a radius of 10 cm and an index of refraction of 1.52, coated with a reflective layer. The participant struggles with applying the correct equations, specifically the Lensmaker's formula for thick lenses and the mirror formula, due to the complexities introduced by the medium's refractive index. The correct approach involves using the ray-transfer matrix formulation for par-axial ray optics, which accommodates both lenses and mirrors effectively.

PREREQUISITES
  • Understanding of the Lensmaker's formula for thick lenses
  • Knowledge of the mirror formula and its assumptions
  • Familiarity with ray optics and par-axial approximation
  • Basic principles of optics, including refractive indices
NEXT STEPS
  • Study the ray-transfer matrix formulation in optics
  • Learn about the application of the Lensmaker's formula in different media
  • Explore the implications of spherical mirrors in optical systems
  • Review the concept of par-axial approximation in lens systems
USEFUL FOR

Students and professionals in optics, physics educators, and anyone involved in solving complex lens and mirror problems in optical systems.

TaylorRiles
Messages
1
Reaction score
0

Homework Statement


Problem Statement: A glass sphere with radius R = 10 cm and index n = 1.52 is coated with a reflecting layer over one hemisphere. An object with a height of h = 1 cm is placed within 15 cm in front of the clear surface of the sphere. Determine the position, the size, and the character of the final image.

My issue is that there are too many generalizations to account for, and I can't find the right equations. We cannot use the thin lens equation because the lens is a sphere; I don't think we can use the ordinary mirror formula because the reflective surface is inside a medium with non-unity index of refraction. And how does object height fit into all this?

Homework Equations


Lensmaker's formula that accounts for thick lenses:
1/f = (n - 1)(1/R1 - 1/R2 + ((n-1)d)/(n*R1*R2)
where n is index of refraction of lens, d is thickness of lens (in this case diameter of sphere, I believe), R1 is radius of lens facing object, R2 is radius facing away (will be negative).

Lensmaker's formula that accounts for objects in different media:
1/f = [ (n of lens/n of outside medium) -1][ (R1-R2)/R1*R2]

Mirror formula (whose assumptions may or may not include immersion in not-air medium)
1/p + 1/q = -2/r
where r is radius of curvature, p is object distance, q is image distance.

The Attempt at a Solution



First considered lens. Used lensmaker's formula for thick lenses and used the formula
1/f = (n lens) - 1)(1/R1 - 1/R2 + ((n-1)d)/(n*R1*R2), with R1 = 10,R2 = -10, n = 1.52, d = 20. Got f of lens equal to -7.16. The solutions manual says that's incorrect, and they use this formula:
1/(object distance) + (n lens)/(image distance) = ((n lens)-1)/R.
I can see where the right side came from, but not the n lens on top of image distance. Help?
And then once the mirror comes in, I'm lost. The image should form way to the right of the mirror but never does. How do we deal with that?
Thanks so much!
 
Last edited:
Physics news on Phys.org
Welcome to PF;
The most general formulation of par-axial ray optics is probably the ray-transfer matrix formulation.
It will even handle mirrors.

First considered lens. Used lensmaker's formula for thick lenses and used the formula
1/f = (n lens) - 1)(1/R1 - 1/R2 + ((n-1)d)/(n*R1*R2), with R1 = 10,R2 = -10, n = 1.52, d = 20. Got f of lens equal to -7.16. The solutions manual says that's incorrect, and they use this formula:
1/(object distance) + (n lens)/(image distance) = ((n lens)-1)/R.
I can see where the right side came from, but not the n lens on top of image distance. Help?
And then once the mirror comes in, I'm lost. The image should form way to the right of the mirror but never does. How do we deal with that?
I know it is convenient to just plug numbers into equations and believe whatever comes out but that is not how physics is done.
You are best letting the physics be your guide and running through the calculation in several steps.

The fat-lense lensmakers equation is not appropriate fr this situation because you don't have a fat lens.

In the par-axial approximation, what you have is a 3-element system ...
1. spherical interface
2. length of glass
3. spherical mirror
 

Similar threads

  • · Replies 11 ·
Replies
11
Views
2K
  • · Replies 2 ·
Replies
2
Views
1K
  • · Replies 5 ·
Replies
5
Views
2K
  • · Replies 2 ·
Replies
2
Views
2K
  • · Replies 7 ·
Replies
7
Views
2K
  • · Replies 11 ·
Replies
11
Views
2K
  • · Replies 3 ·
Replies
3
Views
1K
Replies
2
Views
3K
Replies
1
Views
2K
  • · Replies 8 ·
Replies
8
Views
2K