Most Massive Freely Moving Object Ever Built?

  • Thread starter Hornbein
  • Start date
In summary: I'd say it has to be a ship of some kind. Might not be a military vessel though, some of the biggest oil tankers and other cargo ships are gigantic.In summary, the most massive freely moving object ever built by man is the supertanker.
  • #1
Hornbein
2,038
1,657
What is the most massive freely moving object ever built by man? That is, things like drawbridges aren't freely moving.

I suspect that it could be the battleship Yamoto, but can't get the info. Ships are measured in deadweight tonnage, which means something like their carrying capacity. Lightweight ships with high volume have the most deadweight tonnage. I want to know sheer mass.
 
Physics news on Phys.org
  • #2
Yea well when those ships are full of cargo then their mass isn't very light weight.

Trains can also be miles long and when full of cargo must weigh and awful lot.
 
  • #3
I'd say it has to be a ship of some kind.
Might not be a military vessel though, some of the biggest oil tankers and other cargo ships are gigantic.
http://www.wonderslist.com/top-10-biggest-ships/
 
  • #4
I want the MOST MASSIVE object. Not the object that can carry the most mass.
 
  • #5
Well it's probably almost definitely Gigantor.
 
  • #6
Or maybe Michio Kaku's ego.
 
  • Like
Likes phinds
  • #7
Hornbein said:
I want the MOST MASSIVE object. Not the object that can carry the most mass.
I know, but the biggest one described in that link (FLNG), apparently needed 260,000 tonnes of steel just to construct it, that's not it's weight when operating.
 
  • #8
Hornbein said:
I want the MOST MASSIVE object. Not the object that can carry the most mass.
A supertanker's gross tonnage is the total, which is what it is carrying plus its empty weight. I'm not sure why you don't think that's a useful answer to your question.
 
  • #9
dipole said:
Or maybe Michio Kaku's ego.

2 questions:

1.) Who's Michio Kaku?
2.) What did he do to rouse the ire of the Physics Forums community? Because I see him getting hated on like all the time.

OT: I guess it depends on what is meant by "largest" and by "freely moving". If by largest moving machine you mean the most possible mass, then no question it would be a fully-loaded supertanker. But in terms of dry weight, their mass would be challenged by a very large train, although one could also dispute that as those are put together by many individual cars rather than being a single machine.

The submarine cables that connect across the Atlantic and Pacific oceans float some distance above the seafloor and thus are arguably "freely-moving", and win for sheer length as they can be thousands of miles in length.

Or maybe you mean most massive freely-moving solid object, in which case I think it would be the 730-ton "mass damper" ().
 
  • #10
russ_watters said:
A supertanker's gross tonnage is the total, which is what it is carrying plus its empty weight. I'm not sure why you don't think that's a useful answer to your question.
When someone asks you your weight do you include whatever you are carrying?
 
  • #11
jack476 said:
2 questions:

1.) Who's Michio Kaku?
2.) What did he do to rouse the ire of the Physics Forums community? Because I see him getting hated on like all the time.

().


Today I was trying to learn about how quantum computation works. I resorted to a Kaku video. He knew less than I do and was spreading horse manure.

He said computer companies were going to quantum computing in order to get a greater density of storage. This is completely false. Quantum computers are inferior to ordinary in all respects other than for solving a rather specialized set of problems that never arise for the everyday computer user.
 
  • Like
Likes rootone
  • #12
Hornbein said:
[...]
He said computer companies were going to quantum computing in order to get a greater density of storage. This is completely false. Quantum computers are inferior to ordinary in all respects other than for solving a rather specialized set of problems that never arise for the everyday computer user.
I totally agree. This and its contemporaries such as Grid, DNA Computing and Computing With Words via Fuzzy Logics I admit are like big inflated balloons or dead ends created by dreamers.
 
  • #13
Hornbein said:
What is the most massive freely moving object ever built by man? That is, things like drawbridges aren't freely moving.

I suspect that it could be the battleship Yamoto, but can't get the info. Ships are measured in deadweight tonnage, which means something like their carrying capacity. Lightweight ships with high volume have the most deadweight tonnage. I want to know sheer mass.
Well, you do need the correct name of the Yamato if you want to find information about her:

https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Japanese_battleship_Yamato

Naval vessels are measured by their displacement tonnage, since deadweight tonnage has little meaning for such vessels. The Yamato, while displacing a massive 70,527 long tons full load, is no longer the most massive naval vessel ever constructed. That title belongs to the US nuclear carriers of the Nimitz class:

https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Nimitz-class_aircraft_carrier

These vessels can have a full load displacement of over 104,000 long tons, easily beating the comparable figure for the Yamato (and they're faster, to boot).

Super tankers are the most massive ships by total displacement tonnage (which includes cargo):

https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/List_of_world's_longest_ships

The largest and longest tanker ever built had a total displacement of more than 650,000 metric tons and a length of more than 450 meters.

FWIW, the terms gross tonnage and net tonnage don't refer to the mass or displacement of a vessel. These tonnages roughly measure the cargo-carrying capacity of a vessel by its internal volume. The old standard was that an internal volume of 100 cubic feet = 1 gross ton, but newer international tonnage conventions don't rely on such simple equivalents any longer.

https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Tonnage

Passenger and cruise ship lines advertise the sizes of their vessel by typically using the gross tonnage figure, rather than displacement or deadweight. The deadweight capacity of a typical passenger vessel is relatively small in comparison with its total displacement, since the passenger vessel is designed to carry only her passengers, their luggage, provisions, etc. Because there is no simple equivalence between gross tonnage and displacement tonnage, it takes some digging to find out the displacements of most cruise vessels.
 
  • #14
Silicon Waffle said:
This and its contemporaries such as Grid, DNA Computing and Computing With Words via Fuzzy Logics I admit are like big inflated balloons or dead ends created by dreamers.

You do realize that the LHC Computing Grid provides billions of cpu-hours per year to the LHC experiments? That if it were a single computer, it would be approximately the 4th largest in the world?
 
  • Like
Likes Silicon Waffle
  • #15
Hornbein said:
When someone asks you your weight do you include whatever you are carrying?
It depends on the context. Clothes are often included, as are any other gear if you are boarding a plane. The difficulty here to me is because large machines exist solely for the purpose of carrying things, to not include what they are carrying just seems odd. Heck, in many cases, they can't not be carrying something because they might tip over, so if they don't have cargo, they must have ballast. Would you at least include a ship's own fuel?

But hey, it's your thread and I really don't know what the point of this is.
 
  • #16
russ_watters said:
But hey, it's your thread and I really don't know what the point of this is.

It might not be a bad idea to get the ground rules in advance. Otherwise it's going to be "How about this?" "Nope - doesn't count." "OK, how about this?" "Nope - doesn't count."
 
  • #17
Why hasn't anybody brought up someone's mother yet?
 
  • #18
PhotonSSBM said:
Why hasn't anybody brought up someone's mother yet?

Two sailors are in the brig. One says to the other, "what are you in for?"
"Just following orders."
'What orders?"
"If it moves, salute it. If it doesn't move, lift it, and if it's too big to lift, paint it."
"So what's the problem?"
"I painted the admiral's wife."
 
  • Like
Likes DrClaude, russ_watters and PhotonSSBM
  • #19
PhotonSSBM said:
Why hasn't anybody brought up someone's mother yet?
Cuz not everybody's mother is a whale. :wink:
 
  • #20
SteamKing said:
Cuz not everybody's mother is a whale. :wink:
The set of all whale moms is nonempty. Quite the opposite actually. Therefore the joke stands as consistent.
 
  • #21
dipole said:
Yea well when those ships are full of cargo then their mass isn't very light weight.

Trains can also be miles long and when full of cargo must weigh and awful lot.
Mile long train about 100 cars at 100 tons each ( 50 tons of cargo per car + tare = 50 ton ) = 10, 000 ton

Need about a train load of trains to unload a cargo ship.
 
  • #22
256bits said:
Mile long train about 100 cars at 100 tons each ( 50 tons of cargo per car + tare = 50 ton ) = 10, 000 ton

Need about a train load of trains to unload a cargo ship.
Puny.

Here is a list of the largest container vessels (by capacity of 20-foot equivalent units (TEU):

https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/List_of_largest_container_ships

The vessels with the largest capacity can carry up to 19,224 TEU. If you laid out that many containers end to end, not trying to account for rail couplings, etc., the ship's cargo would stretch 19,224 × 20 / 5280 = 72.82 miles (45.25 km). Each TEU can hold up to about 20 tons of cargo.

A typical train with 100 cars might have been able to load the cargo from an old-style break bulk vessel 50-odd years ago, but it would take dozens of trains to handle just one container cargo from one container vessel nowadays.
 
  • Like
Likes 256bits
  • #23
SteamKing said:
but it would take dozens of trains to handle just one container cargo from one container vessel nowadays.
I did say a "trainload of trains" - just didn't actually know how many.:approve: ( How come there is no "thumbs up" smilie? )
I like the followup.
PS: 72.82 miles is closer to a 100 km than 45.
 
  • #24
256bits said:
I did say a "trainload of trains" - just didn't actually know how many.:approve: ( How come there is no "thumbs up" smilie? )
I like the followup.
PS: 72.82 miles is closer to a 100 km than 45.
Yeah, you right. It's about 116 km.
 
  • #25
I guess what actually happens with the arrival of one of those gigantic container ships at a port is that the containers are taken into local storage as quick;y as possible so the ship can be used again.
Distribution of the offloaded containers is another ball game.
 
  • #27

1. What is the "Most Massive Freely Moving Object Ever Built"?

The "Most Massive Freely Moving Object Ever Built" is a massive floating island or structure that has been specifically designed and constructed to move freely on the surface of the ocean. It is a type of artificial island or floating city, and it is intended to provide a self-sustaining living space for a large population.

2. How big is the "Most Massive Freely Moving Object Ever Built"?

The size of the "Most Massive Freely Moving Object Ever Built" can vary depending on the specific design and purpose. However, it is typically several square kilometers in size, and it can accommodate thousands of people.

3. What materials are used to build the "Most Massive Freely Moving Object Ever Built"?

The materials used to build the "Most Massive Freely Moving Object Ever Built" can vary, but they typically include steel, concrete, and other durable materials that can withstand the harsh ocean environment. Some designs also incorporate renewable energy sources, such as solar panels, to power the structure.

4. What is the purpose of the "Most Massive Freely Moving Object Ever Built"?

The "Most Massive Freely Moving Object Ever Built" has several potential purposes, including providing a self-sustaining living space for a large population, conducting scientific research, and serving as a hub for offshore industries, such as renewable energy production and aquaculture.

5. How is the "Most Massive Freely Moving Object Ever Built" anchored in place?

The "Most Massive Freely Moving Object Ever Built" is typically anchored in place using a combination of mooring systems and dynamic positioning technology. This allows the structure to move with the natural ocean currents and waves while still maintaining its position in a specific location.

Similar threads

  • General Discussion
Replies
4
Views
651
  • Science and Math Textbooks
Replies
1
Views
916
  • Sci-Fi Writing and World Building
Replies
10
Views
3K
  • Astronomy and Astrophysics
Replies
5
Views
3K
  • General Engineering
Replies
4
Views
3K
  • Introductory Physics Homework Help
Replies
3
Views
3K
  • Sci-Fi Writing and World Building
3
Replies
84
Views
7K
  • Quantum Physics
Replies
31
Views
4K
  • Beyond the Standard Models
Replies
30
Views
7K
Replies
2
Views
2K
Back
Top