Most physics-ey engineering discipline

  • Thread starter Thread starter Codester09
  • Start date Start date
  • Tags Tags
    Engineering
Click For Summary
SUMMARY

The discussion centers on the engineering disciplines that incorporate the most physics, particularly for individuals with a physics background considering a career switch. Key fields identified include Electrical Engineering, Mechanical Engineering, Nuclear Engineering, and Materials Science Engineering. Electrical Engineering is noted for its diverse subtopics, including electromagnetics and quantum mechanics, while Mechanical Engineering emphasizes mechanics and thermodynamics. The conversation highlights that graduate degrees often lead to more physics-focused roles within engineering.

PREREQUISITES
  • Understanding of fundamental physics concepts, including mechanics and thermodynamics.
  • Familiarity with Electrical Engineering principles, particularly electromagnetics and solid state physics.
  • Knowledge of Materials Science, including solid state and thermal physics.
  • Basic understanding of Nuclear Engineering concepts.
NEXT STEPS
  • Research the role of quantum mechanics in Electrical Engineering applications.
  • Explore advanced topics in Mechanical Engineering, focusing on fluid dynamics and thermodynamics.
  • Investigate the principles of Materials Science Engineering and its connection to condensed matter physics.
  • Learn about the various branches of Nuclear Engineering and their applications in industry.
USEFUL FOR

This discussion is beneficial for physics majors, engineering students, and professionals considering a transition into engineering fields that heavily utilize physics, such as Electrical, Mechanical, and Nuclear Engineering.

Codester09
Messages
31
Reaction score
0
Which fields of engineering involve the most physics. I'm a physics major at the moment, but after seeing how ridiculous it is to land a tenure position at a university, I'm considering switching to engineering. What do you guys suggest for a physics/math buff?
 
Physics news on Phys.org
Engineering Physics.
 
Yea.. not a degree option @ my school.. that's a pretty uncommon one.
 
Codester09 said:
Which fields of engineering involve the most physics. I'm a physics major at the moment, but after seeing how ridiculous it is to land a tenure position at a university, I'm considering switching to engineering. What do you guys suggest for a physics/math buff?

Just throwing out ideas. I've heard that most physicists are "condensed matter physicists" which is essentially material science. So maybe Material Science Engineering. This might best leave the door open for going back to physics.

After that probably Nuclear Eng. followed by Mechanical., Aero., and Chemical
 
Many engineering disciplines have branches that are "physics-ey". It does depend upon what fields you are interested in.

Electrical engineeering includes electromagnetics (primarily waves), applied solid state physics (semiconductor physics to make better materials for transistors, designi transistors themselves, etc.), and optics. Some EEs end up requiring a lot of quantum mechanics to do their work. Some EE departments include plasma physics, as well.

MEchanical engineering includes mechanics (including solid mechanics), fluid dynamics, and thermodynamics, of course.

MAterials science includes solid state physics, thermal and statistical physics.

I know too little about chemical engineering to say much ...

I must say, however, that in my limited experience (always worked at the same place ...) the engineers in the workplace that get to think the most about the physics tend to be those with graduate degrees.

jason
 
The amount of science you want to deal with in engineering isn't depend upon what field you choose but up to you. I wouldn't be so much concerned with which field you choose, but what area of physics you want to work in. For example, if you like physical chemistry go into mechanical or chemical, if you like nuclear physics, go into nuclear engineering, etc.
 
Codester09 said:
Which fields of engineering involve the most physics. I'm a physics major at the moment, but after seeing how ridiculous it is to land a tenure position at a university, I'm considering switching to engineering. What do you guys suggest for a physics/math buff?

I'm a physics/math buff and I chose electrical engineering. I can't say EE has the most physics/math compared to other engineering areas, but maybe it offers the most diverse range of subtopics in both math and physics.

There is a wide range of topics in EE and not all of them require detailed knowledge of physics and math - for example computer or circuit design. However, you can easily steer yourself more towards physics/math based areas. You need quantum mechanics to understand semiconductor and other solid state devices. Electromagnetics/optics, acoustics, mechanics are other examples of physics areas. Math areas include differential equations, linear algebra, vector calculus, Fourier and Laplace transform theory and application, probability theory and stochastic processes, feedback and control theory, discrete time mathematical theory, linear systems analysis. When you get to grad level in EE, you will find some people are technologists, some are almost pure applied mathematicians, some are basically applied physicists and some are jacks of all trades (with the likely chance of being a master of none).

Differential geometry isn't used much in engineering, but you can learn it easily enough on your own because the covered vector calculus with general curvilinear coordinates and tensor calculations gets you close. Mechanical engineering is also a good choice if you prefer mechanics, fluids and thermodynamics. It's really close between mechanical and electrical engineering, but I typically find electrical engineers have been exposed to a wider range of math analysis theory. I think physics gives the best overall applied mathematics background and of course the best physics background. However, perhaps engineers are a little better at using math and physics to get answers efficiently for real world design problems. For example, a physics major is better suited to do a spacetime coordinate transform for the electromagnetic field components in a special relativity problem, and most EEs might not even know how to approach that, but a physics major might not even know the correct form of Maxwell's equations for designing and optimizing a motor with practical ferromagnetic materials, or if they do, they might struggle to get answers with it. So, with any area you choose, you should seek to keep learning to improve your knowledge and capabilities over time.
 

Similar threads

Replies
12
Views
3K
  • · Replies 6 ·
Replies
6
Views
2K
  • · Replies 13 ·
Replies
13
Views
2K
  • · Replies 8 ·
Replies
8
Views
2K
  • · Replies 13 ·
Replies
13
Views
2K
  • · Replies 22 ·
Replies
22
Views
5K
  • · Replies 3 ·
Replies
3
Views
2K
Replies
23
Views
3K
  • · Replies 7 ·
Replies
7
Views
2K
  • · Replies 3 ·
Replies
3
Views
2K