Motion of a particle subject to a variable resisitive force

Click For Summary
The discussion centers on the motion of a particle affected by a variable resistive force, specifically analyzing the expression for distance x in relation to potential energy changes. The user derives the equation for x and questions the interpretation of potential energy lost when setting velocity to zero. They acknowledge the kinetic energy loss represented in the equation but seek clarification on the other components contributing to potential energy changes. Additionally, there is confusion regarding the existence of terminal velocity during vertical ascent versus descent. The conversation highlights the complexities of energy transformations in variable resistance scenarios.
nokia8650
Messages
216
Reaction score
0
http://img338.imageshack.us/img338/193/33379676.th.jpg

See the image above. I am able to get to (where x = distance):

x = (1/2k)ln((g - k(V^2)(tan a )^2)/(g - kv^2))

If you let v = 0, and then multiply by mg, you find potential energy gained presumably - I don't understand why the question states the potential energy lost.

Obviously the 0.5(MV^2)*(tan a)^2 part of the expression is due to the lost of the kinetic energy, however for the other part of the expression I am struggling.

Thanks for any help in advance.
 
Last edited by a moderator:
Physics news on Phys.org
If the stone is thrown vertically upwards how can the terminal velocity exist?
 
ah right, so why does it say in the ascent, as opposed to descent?

Thanks
 

Similar threads

  • · Replies 4 ·
Replies
4
Views
2K
  • · Replies 6 ·
Replies
6
Views
2K
  • · Replies 20 ·
Replies
20
Views
2K
  • · Replies 6 ·
Replies
6
Views
2K
  • · Replies 1 ·
Replies
1
Views
2K
Replies
4
Views
2K
  • · Replies 14 ·
Replies
14
Views
3K
  • · Replies 15 ·
Replies
15
Views
1K
  • · Replies 13 ·
Replies
13
Views
1K
  • · Replies 3 ·
Replies
3
Views
956