Motion Under Gravity: Physics Basics

  • Thread starter Thread starter GFREY
  • Start date Start date
  • Tags Tags
    Gravity Motion
Click For Summary
SUMMARY

This discussion focuses on solving a physics problem involving two particles, P and Q, under the influence of gravity. The problem requires calculating the time and distance each particle takes to reach the ground, given that particle Q is projected downward with an initial velocity of 3 m/s after a delay of 3 seconds. Key equations discussed include the first law of motion and the equation of motion: s = s_0 + v_0 t + (1/2)at^2. Participants emphasize the importance of showing work and understanding the relationship between the two particles' motions to find a viable solution.

PREREQUISITES
  • Understanding of Newton's equations of motion
  • Familiarity with initial velocity and acceleration concepts
  • Ability to solve quadratic equations
  • Knowledge of kinematic equations for vertical motion
NEXT STEPS
  • Study the derivation and application of Newton's equations of motion
  • Learn how to analyze motion in a gravitational field
  • Practice solving problems involving multiple objects in motion
  • Explore the concept of relative velocity in different frames of reference
USEFUL FOR

Students studying physics, educators teaching mechanics, and anyone interested in understanding the dynamics of motion under gravity.

GFREY
Messages
8
Reaction score
1
New poster has been reminded to always show their work when starting schoolwork threads
Homework Statement
A particle P is let fall vertically from a height to the ground. Another particle Q is projected down vertically down 3s later with the velocity 3m/s from the same height. If both particles reach the ground simultaneously, calculate the;
1) time by each particle to reach the ground
2) distance travelled by each particle to ground
Relevant Equations
Newtons equations of motion
.
 
  • Like
Likes   Reactions: Delta2
Physics news on Phys.org
What have you tried so far?
 
GFREY said:
nothing that worked

please show what you did so we can point you in the right direction.
Also read the guidelines.
 
drmalawi said:
please show what you did so we can point you in the right direction.
Also read the guidelines.
I tried to find the initial velocity of Q using the first law of motion and from there calculate the time for Q
 
GFREY said:
I tried to find the initial velocity of Q using the first law of motion and from there calculate the time for Q
Please show us the math you tried.
 
berkeman said:
Please show us the math you tried.
v = u + gt v = 0
u = gt
u = 10m/s^2 * 3
u = 30m/s
 
GFREY said:
v = u + gt v = 0
u = gt
u = 10m/s^2 * 3
u = 30m/s

But you are given the initial velocity of ball Q in the problem.

Have you tried ##s = s_0 + v_0 t + \dfrac{at^2}{2}## formula? Can you figure out why it could be relevant here given your initial conditions?
 
drmalawi said:
But you are given the initial velocity of ball Q in the problem
drmalawi said:
But you are given the initial velocity of ball Q in the problem.

Have you tried ##s = s_0 + v_0 t + \dfrac{at^2}{2}## formula? Can you figure out why it could be relevant here given your initial conditions?
I tried it and s was 99m given conditions. Idk
 
  • #10
GFREY said:
Homework Statement:: A particle P is let fall vertically from a height to the ground. Another particle Q is projected down vertically down 3s later with the velocity 3m/s from the same height. If both particles reach the ground simultaneously, calculate the;
1) time by each particle to reach the ground
2) distance traveled by each particle to ground
Relevant Equations:: Newtons equations of motion

.
Where did you find this problem?
 
  • #11
PeroK said:
Where did you find this problem?
in my textbook. Is it wrong?
 
  • #12
Question has no viable answer. You should be able to prove that by trying to figure it out in the first place.

Does the textbook give an answer ?
 
  • #13
GFREY said:
in my textbook. Is it wrong?
It's not clear to me how Q catches P. That said , your equations should tell you that.
 
  • #14
hmmm27 said:
Question has no viable answer. You should be able to prove that by trying to figure it out in the first place.

Does the textbook give an answer ?
yes. I don't really understand the requirements of the question
 
  • #15
PeroK said:
It's not clear to me how Q catches P. That said , your equations should tell you that.
maybe it has a higher initial velocity
 
  • #16
GFREY said:
yes. I don't really understand the requirements of the question
The requirements of this forum would be that you show your work in trying to get an answer right up to the bit where it doesn't make any sense ; alternatively, explain why it has no real answer.
 
  • Like
Likes   Reactions: PeroK
  • #17
hmmm27 said:
The requirements of this forum would be that you show your work in trying to get an answer right up to the bit where it doesn't make any sense ; alternatively explain why it has no real answer.
okay
 
  • #18
Hint: at the time (t=3 s) ball Q is dropped, what is the velocity of ball P?
What is the velocity of ball Q and P at say t = 3,1 seconds?
 
  • #19
drmalawi said:
Hint: at the time (t=3 s) ball Q is dropped, what is the velocity of ball P?
More precisely, ball Q is projected down with initial speed 3 m/s. Sometimes "dropped" is interpreted as equivalent to "released from rest".

To @GFREY : I will ask what has already been asked but differently: when both balls are in the air, how does the vertical distance between them change? Does it increase, decrease or say the same? Please justify your choice using equations or reasoning.
 
  • Like
Likes   Reactions: Delta2 and malawi_glenn
  • #20
PeroK said:
It's not clear to me how Q catches P. That said , your equations should tell you that.
I agree. The projected time at which the two trajectories intersect will not be positive.

It should fairly easy to write down the two requisite equations and solve them for ##t## (for the first particle to reach the ground) and ##d## (the displacement of both particles when they hit the ground together).

The first step in solving the problem should be defining the variables that will be used. The second step should be writing down equations using those variables. The third step should be solving those equations.

As @kuruman hints, a formula for the separation between the particles as a function of time (past 3 seconds anyway) should be do-able. That is not exactly the approach I'd have taken, but it is equivalent.
 
  • #21
jbriggs444 said:
As @kuruman hints, a formula for the separation between the particles as a function of time (past 3 seconds anyway) should be do-able. That is not exactly the approach I'd have taken, but it is equivalent.
Actually in my approach a formula is not necessarily necessary if one considers that, in the non-inertial frame, the relative velocity is conserved.
 
  • Like
Likes   Reactions: jbriggs444
  • #22
kuruman said:
Actually in my approach a formula is not necessarily necessary if one considers that, in the non-inertial frame, the relative velocity is conserved.
In the inertial frame as well.
 
  • Like
Likes   Reactions: nasu

Similar threads

Replies
13
Views
2K
  • · Replies 8 ·
Replies
8
Views
2K
Replies
4
Views
650
Replies
8
Views
2K
  • · Replies 5 ·
Replies
5
Views
2K
  • · Replies 2 ·
Replies
2
Views
713
  • · Replies 10 ·
Replies
10
Views
2K
  • · Replies 19 ·
Replies
19
Views
2K
  • · Replies 10 ·
Replies
10
Views
2K
  • · Replies 3 ·
Replies
3
Views
872