I've read that the choice of Gauge group [itex]\mathrm{SU}(2)_\mathrm{L}\times \mathrm{U}(1)_\mathrm{Y}[/itex] can be justified by the fact that the electromagnetic charge and the flavour-changing weak charge do not form a closed SU(2) current algebra. The solution is to tack on an additional U(1) group and to interpret the photon as a superposition of the U(1) and the neutral SU(2) gauge fields.(adsbygoogle = window.adsbygoogle || []).push({});

I saw this explained somewhere by the fact that since the charge operator is

[itex]Q = \left(

\begin{matrix}

0 & 0 \\

0 & -1

\end{matrix}

\right)[/itex],

it does not commute with any of the Pauli matrices. Can anyone explain where this definition of the charge operator comes from? I'm failing to understand even what the charge operator is.

**Physics Forums - The Fusion of Science and Community**

Dismiss Notice

Join Physics Forums Today!

The friendliest, high quality science and math community on the planet! Everyone who loves science is here!

The friendliest, high quality science and math community on the planet! Everyone who loves science is here!

# Motivation for SU(2) x U(1) and charge operator

Loading...

Similar Threads - Motivation charge operator | Date |
---|---|

I Interaction time between charged particles | Mar 14, 2018 |

I Stopping Power and Range units for charged particles | Feb 13, 2018 |

I CP transformation, charge conjugation and antimatter | Feb 9, 2018 |

B What is source of fundamental particle charge? | Jan 4, 2018 |

Motivation for electromagnetic field tensor | Apr 1, 2009 |

**Physics Forums - The Fusion of Science and Community**