Motivation for SU(2) x U(1) and charge operator

  • Thread starter jdstokes
  • Start date
  • #1
523
0
I've read that the choice of Gauge group [itex]\mathrm{SU}(2)_\mathrm{L}\times \mathrm{U}(1)_\mathrm{Y}[/itex] can be justified by the fact that the electromagnetic charge and the flavour-changing weak charge do not form a closed SU(2) current algebra. The solution is to tack on an additional U(1) group and to interpret the photon as a superposition of the U(1) and the neutral SU(2) gauge fields.

I saw this explained somewhere by the fact that since the charge operator is

[itex]Q = \left(
\begin{matrix}
0 & 0 \\
0 & -1
\end{matrix}
\right)[/itex],

it does not commute with any of the Pauli matrices. Can anyone explain where this definition of the charge operator comes from? I'm failing to understand even what the charge operator is.
 

Answers and Replies

  • #2
Maybe it comes from Gell-Mann–Nishijima phenomenological formula which relates SU(2) weak isospin [tex]I_z[/tex], weak hypercharge [tex]Y[/tex] and electric charge [tex]Q[/tex]?

[tex]\qquad Q = I_z + {1 \over 2} Y[/tex]
 

Related Threads on Motivation for SU(2) x U(1) and charge operator

Replies
14
Views
6K
  • Last Post
Replies
2
Views
14K
  • Last Post
Replies
3
Views
2K
  • Last Post
Replies
6
Views
7K
Replies
1
Views
2K
  • Last Post
Replies
11
Views
4K
  • Last Post
Replies
1
Views
2K
  • Last Post
Replies
0
Views
2K
Top