Motivations for plum pudding model (advanced)

  • Context: Undergrad 
  • Thread starter Thread starter Question Man
  • Start date Start date
  • Tags Tags
    advanced Model
Join the discussion
Ask a follow-up here, or get your own question answered by working scientists, mathematicians and engineers — people, not an autocomplete.
Real named experts · corrections over time · the nuance an AI answer skips
3 replies · 2K views
Question Man
Messages
9
Reaction score
0
Hello!

Is anyone able to direct me to information regarding the motivation of the plum pudding model of the atom (as opposed to a simply a collection of positive and negative charges)?

I am looking for an explanation at the advanced undergrad + level. I recall once reading an explanation in an introductory book, but forgetting it because I was able to recognise that it was a bogus exposition.
 
Physics news on Phys.org
Your best bet is to try to find a biography of J.J. Thomson somewhere. Or at least an historical account of his cathode ray experiments. I know he formatted his hypothesis of the plum pudding model based on the results of those experiments, but I don't know much beyond what you can easily find on wikipedia and elsewhere.
 
There is a link on the bottom of the wikipedia page to an excerpt of Thomson's original paper. I have found the whole paper here :

http://www.cond-mat.physik.uni-mainz.de/~oettel/ws10/thomson_PhilMag_7_237_1904.pdf

In it, Thomson seems to show that if the electrons are restriceted to move in various planes whose centers are the center of a uniformly charged shpere, they will find their equilibrium in concentric rings in those various planes.

I cannot infer why he would use a uniform sphere of positive charge rather than a point charge though, other than that he anticipated the former would provide better test implications (about the chemical properties of various atoms, for instance). I may have to wait until I get back to my university to continue investigating, if I have time.
 
Last edited by a moderator: