Movie Bloopers: Lara Croft Tomb Raider Cradle of Life

  • Thread starter Thread starter Danger
  • Start date Start date
  • Tags Tags
    Movie
Click For Summary

Discussion Overview

The discussion revolves around perceived inaccuracies and "bloopers" in the movie "Lara Croft Tomb Raider: Cradle of Life," as well as broader commentary on movie physics and the portrayal of characters. Participants explore various aspects of the film's realism, particularly regarding scuba diving, shark behavior, and cosmetic surgery of the lead actress.

Discussion Character

  • Exploratory
  • Debate/contested
  • Conceptual clarification

Main Points Raised

  • One participant questions the realism of a character losing a scuba tank and attracting a shark with blood, citing laws of diffusion and shark speed.
  • Another participant raises concerns about the pressure effects of being in an underwater cavern and the potential for decompression sickness.
  • There is a debate regarding the realism of a character's physical appearance, with some asserting that certain features are not natural while others defend their authenticity.
  • Some participants express skepticism about how sharks can detect blood from great distances, with varying explanations offered about diffusion and sensitivity to low concentrations.
  • Comments on the portrayal of historical inaccuracies in other films, such as "10,000 BC," are also made, with participants sharing their opinions on the absurdity of certain elements.
  • Discussions about the attractiveness of the lead actress, Angelina Jolie, lead to disagreements about beauty standards and subjective opinions on her appearance.

Areas of Agreement / Disagreement

Participants express multiple competing views on the realism of the movie's scenarios and the attractiveness of the lead actress. There is no consensus on the accuracy of the film's portrayal of physics or the character's physical attributes.

Contextual Notes

Participants reference various assumptions about movie physics and character portrayals without resolving the underlying uncertainties or providing definitive answers.

Who May Find This Useful

Readers interested in film analysis, movie physics, and discussions about character portrayals in cinema may find this thread engaging.

  • #31
Yeah I agree, she is (to me) rather unattractive.
 
Biology news on Phys.org
  • #32
If somehow we blindingly accepted that no surgery has been done on her, I'm sure 99% of men would disagree with you two lol.
 

Similar threads

  • · Replies 24 ·
Replies
24
Views
15K
  • · Replies 1 ·
Replies
1
Views
10K