Moving a 2D object to a 3D world

  • Context: Undergrad 
  • Thread starter Thread starter GraemeD
  • Start date Start date
  • Tags Tags
    2d 3d
Click For Summary
SUMMARY

This discussion centers on the impossibility of a purely 2D object existing in a 3D world. Graeme poses a question about moving a square from a 2D XY coordinate system to a 3D XYZ coordinate system. Kerry clarifies that while a 2D object cannot physically exist in three dimensions, it can be represented with minimal depth, akin to a piece of paper. The conversation concludes with a mathematical explanation that emphasizes the necessity of volume for physical existence, asserting that a 2D object has zero volume and, consequently, zero mass.

PREREQUISITES
  • Understanding of 2D and 3D coordinate systems
  • Basic knowledge of mass, density, and volume
  • Familiarity with mathematical integrals
  • Concept of spatial dimensions in physics
NEXT STEPS
  • Research the mathematical foundations of volume in three-dimensional space
  • Explore the implications of dimensionality in physics and computer graphics
  • Study the concept of mass and density in relation to physical objects
  • Learn about representations of 2D objects in 3D modeling software
USEFUL FOR

This discussion is beneficial for computer graphics developers, physicists, and anyone interested in the relationship between dimensions in simulations and real-world applications.

GraemeD
Messages
2
Reaction score
0
Hi all,

I like working with computer graphics so I often work between 2D and 3D computer simulations.

For example let’s say you had a square in a XY coordinate system and you wanted to move it to an XYZ coordinate system. Placing it in directly would mean that when viewed along the Z direction the square won’t exist as there is no Z information.

This is fine for a computer simulation but how would this example translate to the “real world”? Could a 2D object appear in 3D space or would it be forced to have a Z dimension making it a cube?

Thanks for any input that you can provide and I hope I posted this question in the correct forum.

Thanks,

Graeme
 
Mathematics news on Phys.org
In the "real world" everything has three spatial dimensions... so no, your 2D square couldn't physically exist. The best you could do is to give it a very small depth (like a piece of paper, which has this depth compared to it's width and height).

Does this answer your question?

-Kerry
 
KLoux said:
Does this answer your question?
Yes it does, thank you

So I can gain a better understanding do you have any information or links that explains this in more detail? I assume that in theory a 2D object cannot exist in a 3D world but what proof do we have. As I assume this is not something we can prove in a lab somewhere.
 
What kind of proof are you looking for? An equation? Here's a quick attempt...

The foundation of this proof is that in order for any object to physically exist (so you can touch it or hold it in your hand) it must have mass.

In order for it to have mass, it must have density and volume.

The volume is an integral over three spatial dimensions. If anyone of those dimensions is zero, then you end up with and integral over two dimensions times the third dimension (zero). The volume of a 2D object is zero.

Zero volume times any density gives you zero mass.

Zero mass -> no object.

-Kerry
 

Similar threads

  • · Replies 3 ·
Replies
3
Views
2K
  • · Replies 2 ·
Replies
2
Views
2K
  • · Replies 1 ·
Replies
1
Views
2K
  • · Replies 2 ·
Replies
2
Views
2K
  • · Replies 3 ·
Replies
3
Views
2K
  • · Replies 1 ·
Replies
1
Views
2K
Replies
6
Views
2K
  • · Replies 33 ·
2
Replies
33
Views
3K
  • · Replies 9 ·
Replies
9
Views
4K
  • · Replies 24 ·
Replies
24
Views
4K