Moving charges and magnetic fields

Click For Summary
SUMMARY

The discussion centers on the relationship between moving charges, specifically electrons, and the magnetic fields they generate in different inertial frames of reference. It is established that magnetism is a relativistic manifestation of the Coulomb interaction, as described by the electromagnetic tensor. Observers in different frames—one stationary and one moving with the electrons—will perceive the interactions differently, with one observing magnetic fields and the other not, while both frames remain valid. The implications of these observations are crucial for understanding electromagnetic interactions in physics.

PREREQUISITES
  • Understanding of electromagnetic theory, particularly the electromagnetic tensor.
  • Familiarity with the concepts of inertial frames of reference in relativity.
  • Knowledge of Coulomb's law and electrostatic interactions.
  • Basic principles of alternating current (AC) and its effects on nearby charges.
NEXT STEPS
  • Study the electromagnetic tensor in detail to grasp its role in electromagnetism.
  • Explore the implications of special relativity on electric and magnetic fields.
  • Investigate the behavior of charges in AC circuits and their interaction with magnetic fields.
  • Examine thought experiments involving parallel lines of charge to deepen understanding of electromagnetic interactions.
USEFUL FOR

Physicists, electrical engineers, and students of electromagnetism seeking to deepen their understanding of the interplay between moving charges and magnetic fields in various reference frames.

Jdo300
Messages
548
Reaction score
5
Hey,

I was just thinking about the simple concept that a moving electron produces a magnetic field at right angles to its travel... Now here's my question. Since we live in a relativistic universe, what is the charge moving with respect to in order to create the field? If we say the observer, then one is forced to conclude that the electron must always have a magnetic field around it since it is always going to be moving with respect to something... Where am I going wrong here?

- Jason O
 
Physics news on Phys.org
Congratulations! You are thinking subtle and deep thoughts. The way to detect the presence of a magnetic field is to observe its force on a current, that is, on at least one moving test charge. Accordingly, you have a system of two (at a minimum) charges. If both move at the same speed as seen in the lab frame, then in their rest frames they see each other at rest and feel an electrostatic attraction or repulsion. In the lab frame they appear to be responding to each other's magnetic field.

The major, deep conclusion is that magnetism is just a relativistic manifestation of the Coulomb interaction. The precise relation is through the electromagnetic tensor, which you can look up in an advanced E&M book or online at, eg., Wikipedia.
 
consider two cases, both with two electrons.

the first case is where the two electrons whiz by an observer with constant and identical velocities (both direction and speed, so they are not moving relative to each other). the observer concludes one electron is generating a magnetic field and the other electron is moving through the magnetic field and is therefore affected by it and the observer see that. there is, of course, the electrostatic interaction besides the magnetic interaction.

the other case is identical except now the observer is moving alongside the two moving electrons at their velocity. this is a constant velocity, an inertial frame of reference, so it is just as legitimate as any other inertial reference frame, including the one of the "stationary" observer in the first case above. but now what does the observer see? any magnetic field getting generated? from this observer's POV is the other electron moving through a magnetic field, even if one were generated? there remains the electrostatic interaction, though, in this reference frame even if there is no magnetic interaction.

both POVs are inertial and equally valid. how do you resolve the differences of observed behavior between the two?

you can do this thought experiment even better with two identical, infinite, and parallel lines of charge.
 
Hello,

Thanks for the insights here. Ok, here's another question to, hopefully, clarify my understanding here. Let's say, for instance that there is a piece of wire with an AC current flowing through it, and next to this piece of wire we have a negatively charged plate. If we observe the electrons in the wire from the charged plate's prospective, one would expect to see a changing magnetic field exerting a force on the particles in the plate.

Now if one is in the wire moving with the flow of electrons in the wire, the particles on the plate would appear to be moving back and forth so this means that the charges on the plate would appear to be producing a magnetic field that is acting on the charges in the wire right?

- Jason O
 

Similar threads

  • · Replies 5 ·
Replies
5
Views
1K
  • · Replies 7 ·
Replies
7
Views
2K
  • · Replies 7 ·
Replies
7
Views
2K
  • · Replies 20 ·
Replies
20
Views
5K
  • · Replies 3 ·
Replies
3
Views
1K
  • · Replies 2 ·
Replies
2
Views
2K
  • · Replies 7 ·
Replies
7
Views
2K
  • · Replies 8 ·
Replies
8
Views
2K
  • · Replies 3 ·
Replies
3
Views
2K
  • · Replies 9 ·
Replies
9
Views
4K