Moving Charges to Infinity: Work Required and Comparison

  • Thread starter Thread starter aoc0708
  • Start date Start date
  • Tags Tags
    Charge Infinity
Click For Summary
SUMMARY

The discussion focuses on calculating the work required to move electric charges to infinity, specifically a +2.7 µC charge and a -6.1 µC charge, positioned at the corners of a rectangle measuring 0.35 m by 0.22 m. The work done for the +2.7 µC charge was calculated as 0.61749 J. It was concluded that moving the -6.1 µC charge requires less work due to the influence of both attractive and repulsive forces from the surrounding charges, resulting in a final work value of -0.3999 Joules.

PREREQUISITES
  • Understanding of Coulomb's Law and electric force calculations
  • Familiarity with the concept of electric potential energy
  • Proficiency in using the Pythagorean theorem for distance calculations
  • Knowledge of charge interactions (attraction and repulsion)
NEXT STEPS
  • Study the implications of charge signs on electric force and work calculations
  • Learn about electric potential energy and its relation to work done on charges
  • Explore advanced applications of Coulomb's Law in different geometries
  • Investigate the concept of electric field and its impact on charge movement
USEFUL FOR

Physics students, electrical engineers, and anyone interested in electrostatics and charge interactions will benefit from this discussion.

aoc0708
Messages
3
Reaction score
0

Homework Statement



The figure below shows three charges at the corners of a rectangle of length x = 0.35 m and height y = 0.22 m.

http://www.webassign.net/walker/20-23alt.gif (rectangle image)

(a) How much work must be done to move the +2.7 µC charge to infinity?

(b) Suppose, instead, that we move the -6.1 µC charge to infinity. Is the work required in this case greater than, less than, or the same as when we moved the +2.7 µC charge to infinity?

Explain.

(c) Calculate the work needed to move the -6.1 µC charge to infinity?


Homework Equations



W= kq1q2/r

The Attempt at a Solution



I got the correct answer for (a) like this:

W= (9e9)(2.7e-6)(6.1e-6)/.35 + (9e9)(2.7e-6)(3.3e-6)/.4134, with .4134 as the distance between the -3.3 charge and the 2.7 charge via the pythagorean theorem.
.61749 J, was correct; and I guessed that it would take less work to move the -6.1 µC charge for (b). But I'm not entirely sure why this is the case-- is it simply because the distances between the charges are smaller? And for some reason, when I use the same method on (c) as I did on (a), I'm wrong:

(9e9)(6.1e-6)(2.7e-6)/.35 + (9e9)(6.1e-6)(3.3e-6)/.22 yields 1.247, which is not the correct answer. Why is this?

Thank you!


Thank you!
 
Physics news on Phys.org
It looks to me like you need to take into account the sign of the charges. Remember opposite charges attract while same charges repel. The -6.1 uC charge is easier to move to infinity because it sees 1 positive charge attracting it, but also 1 negative charge repelling it.
 
Ah, I see what you mean. Thank you! The correct answer was -.3999 Joules.
 

Similar threads

  • · Replies 2 ·
Replies
2
Views
3K
  • · Replies 12 ·
Replies
12
Views
6K
  • · Replies 8 ·
Replies
8
Views
13K
  • · Replies 7 ·
Replies
7
Views
7K
Replies
4
Views
2K
  • · Replies 1 ·
Replies
1
Views
2K
Replies
5
Views
4K
  • · Replies 1 ·
Replies
1
Views
2K
  • · Replies 1 ·
Replies
1
Views
7K
Replies
3
Views
3K