MP3 Support Confusion: Truth Behind the Termination and Licensing Changes

  • Thread starter Thread starter Algr
  • Start date Start date
Join the discussion
Registration is free. Ask a follow-up in this thread, or start your own.
Sign up Log in
5 replies · 2K views
Algr
Messages
946
Reaction score
496
http://gizmodo.com/developers-of-the-mp3-have-officially-killed-it-1795205540
https://www.macrumors.com/2017/05/15/mp3-format-terminated/

All these news articles are saying that MP3 support in various devices is going to disappear because the maker isn't licencing MP3 any more. But then in the comments people are saying the opposite is true. Licensing programs are being terminated because the patents have expired and everyone can now use it for free. Certainly this is no reason for anyone to remove MP3 support from anything.

What is going on here?
 
Physics news on Phys.org
The second article said:
This article was edited to note that the patents related to MP3 have expired, not the format itself.
 
Algr said:
All these news articles are saying that MP3 support in various devices is going to disappear because the maker isn't licencing MP3 any more. But then in the comments people are saying the opposite is true. Licensing programs are being terminated because the patents have expired and everyone can now use it for free.

What @SlowThinker said; although many of the news stories as well as the Fraunhofer announcement itself don't actually speak of patent expiration, but only of the company having terminated its licensing program for "certain mp3 related patents"; which is a somewhat different thing, since you can claim a patent and attempt to require licensing, only to have others dispute your claim and disregard your licensing.

This seems a case of "catchy headline virus," where news outlets spread essentially the same misleading headline because it grabs the eye, even if it's inaccurate. Repeated casts of a fishing hook into the Google sea pull up additional stories that make it clear that despite the development of newer audio standards, developers may well keep the MP3 standard alive in future audio software & gear just as the GIF standard for images has been kept alive; see this from CNET: MP3 isn't dead, it's just sleeping

If you look at the Wikipedia article on MP3, the subtopic on licensing asserts that there were many patent disputes throughout the history of developing the standard, but that by 2012, most of the critical European patents for the MP3 standard had already expired; and that even in the U.S. the last remaining patent expired in late April of this year; that one seems likely to be the Technicolor patent mentioned in the Fraunhofer announcement:
The basic MP3 decoding and encoding technology is patent-free in the European Union, all patents having expired there by 2012 at the latest. In the United States, the technology became substantially patent-free on 16 April 2017 . . . If the longest-running patent mentioned in the aforementioned references is taken as a measure, then the MP3 technology became patent-free in the United States on 16 April 2017 when U.S. Patent 6,009,399, held by[74] and administered by Technicolor,[75] expired.
 
Last edited:
This one is even worse:
http://www.dailymail.co.uk/sciencet...rmat-killed-founders-terminate-licensing.html

But the digital audio format has now been killed off by the company that invented it.
The Fraunhofer Institute has officially terminated its licensing programme for certain MP3-related patents.
The move has been dubbed the 'official death warrant' of the MP3 by tech experts.

What "experts" said this. The format is set free, not being killed, and "The company that invented it" did nothing, they have no say in the matter.
 
  • Like
Likes   Reactions: UsableThought
Algr said:
Certainly this is no reason for anyone to remove MP3 support from anything.

What is going on here?
One of two things is going to happen: Open-Source MP3 will champion on or Ogg Vorbis will replace it. Either way, I find it to be a win.