Multiple Sources At Different Frequencies (Probability)

Click For Summary
SUMMARY

The discussion centers on calculating the probability that outputs from two sources, A and B, are synchronized at different frequencies. Source A produces outputs every 100 milliseconds, while Source B outputs every 250 milliseconds. The conclusion reached is that the probability of source A being ahead of source B at any given time is 0.1. This finding suggests a straightforward relationship between the output intervals of the two sources.

PREREQUISITES
  • Understanding of basic probability theory
  • Familiarity with time intervals and synchronization concepts
  • Knowledge of event-driven systems
  • Ability to perform calculations involving time-based events
NEXT STEPS
  • Research advanced probability concepts in event synchronization
  • Explore Markov processes for modeling state transitions
  • Learn about Poisson processes and their applications in event timing
  • Investigate statistical methods for analyzing time series data
USEFUL FOR

This discussion is beneficial for statisticians, data analysts, and software engineers working with event-driven architectures who need to understand synchronization and probability in time-based systems.

rollypollybear
Messages
2
Reaction score
0
Hi

My prob theory is rusty and I am a little embarrassed I can't figure this one out - but:

If we have two sources A and B that are producing an output at different frequencies - say A produces outputs every 100ms and B produces an output every 250ms .. Obviously even if they are perfectly synced, A may be ahead of B at certain times (by up to 50ms)...I am trying to calculate the probability that an event from A will be more recent than B at any point in time

Can someone help me out with some pointers on this?

Cheers
 
Physics news on Phys.org
OK I did some scenarios on paper and it looks like the solution is stupidly simple - the probability of source A running at 250ms intervals being ahead of source B running at 100ms intervals is 0.1 ... I don't know if anyone knows how to prove this more elegantly though..
 

Similar threads

  • · Replies 3 ·
Replies
3
Views
3K
Replies
3
Views
4K
  • · Replies 11 ·
Replies
11
Views
6K
Replies
3
Views
2K
  • · Replies 9 ·
Replies
9
Views
1K
  • · Replies 3 ·
Replies
3
Views
2K
  • · Replies 178 ·
6
Replies
178
Views
10K
  • · Replies 9 ·
Replies
9
Views
3K
  • · Replies 12 ·
Replies
12
Views
3K
  • · Replies 21 ·
Replies
21
Views
3K