Multiple time derivatives of gravitational potential

Click For Summary
SUMMARY

The discussion focuses on the calculation of multiple time derivatives of gravitational potential, specifically the second derivative, denoted as $$\ddot{G}$$, derived from the gravitational potential formula $$a = -\frac{\mu}{r^3} \mathbf{r}$$. The user seeks assistance in efficiently computing the third, fourth, and fifth derivatives of $$G$$ without making errors, as the process becomes increasingly complex. Suggestions include using a scalar field proportional to $$\frac{1}{r}$$ for simplification and utilizing the itex tag for inline LaTeX formatting.

PREREQUISITES
  • Understanding of gravitational potential and its mathematical representation.
  • Familiarity with vector calculus and derivatives.
  • Knowledge of LaTeX for mathematical typesetting.
  • Experience with computational tools like Mathematica for symbolic differentiation.
NEXT STEPS
  • Research methods for simplifying vector derivatives in gravitational physics.
  • Learn about scalar fields and their applications in gravitational potential calculations.
  • Explore advanced features of Mathematica for handling vector calculus.
  • Study the itex and tex tags for effective mathematical formatting in online discussions.
USEFUL FOR

Physicists, mathematicians, and students involved in gravitational physics, particularly those working on vector calculus and computational methods for deriving physical equations.

Belginator
Messages
12
Reaction score
0
Hello!

Let's say our gravitational potential is (as usual for 2 body),

$$a = -\frac{\mu}{r^3} \mathbf{r}$$.

Then the gradient of this is G,
$$\frac{\partial G}{\partial \mathbf{r}} = G = \frac{\mu}{r^3} [3 \hat{\mathbf{r}} \hat{\mathbf{r}}^\top - I] $$

Now if we take two time derivatives of G, we get

$$ \ddot{G} = \frac{3\mu}{r^5} [\hat{\mathbf{r}}^\top \mathbf{v})^2 (7 \hat{\mathbf{r}} \hat{\mathbf{r}}^\top - I) - 10(\hat{\mathbf{r}}^\top \mathbf{v})(\mathbf{v} \hat{\mathbf{r}}^\top + \hat{\mathbf{r}} \mathbf{v}^\top) + 2 \mathbf{v} \mathbf{v}^\top - (\mathbf{v}^\top \mathbf{v})(5 \hat{\mathbf{r}} \hat{\mathbf{r}}^\top - I) + (\hat{\mathbf{r}}^\top \hat{\mathbf{r}}) G]$$

Also for completeness, $$\mathbf{r}$$ is the position vector. $$\hat{\mathbf{r}}$$ is the unit position vector. $$r$$ is the norm of the position vector. $$ \mathbf{v}$$ is the velocity vector.

Now this is where it gets tricky, I need to take 3 more time derivatives of $$ \ddot{G}$$ so that I have up to the 5th derivative. The problem is, it's getting so long and tedious that I keep making mistakes. Is there a quick way of taking these derivatives? I tried mathematica but it just gets really messy because it does it in components rather than a vector. Any help is appreciated!
 
Physics news on Phys.org
Well, you may have started off with an error. I think the potential you want is a scalar field proportional to \frac{1}{r} whose gradient is a vector field. From there, all the time derivatives would be vectors rather than matrices, and it might look simpler and be easier to manipulate algebraically.

Also, the itex tag let's you do the same as the tex tag, but in line with a sentence, in case you didn't know.
 
Thanks for your advice, I didn't know about itex, and I actually made a mistake by calling the first equation a potential. It's really the first partial of the potential. But the problem otherwise remains the same, the equations are correct.
 

Similar threads

  • · Replies 7 ·
Replies
7
Views
2K
  • · Replies 7 ·
Replies
7
Views
3K
  • · Replies 6 ·
Replies
6
Views
2K
  • · Replies 5 ·
Replies
5
Views
832
  • · Replies 9 ·
Replies
9
Views
903
  • · Replies 29 ·
Replies
29
Views
2K
  • · Replies 1 ·
Replies
1
Views
600
  • · Replies 2 ·
Replies
2
Views
2K
  • · Replies 14 ·
Replies
14
Views
2K
  • · Replies 1 ·
Replies
1
Views
2K