Muon Decay Width Correction: Derivation & Origin

  • Context: Graduate 
  • Thread starter Thread starter Catria
  • Start date Start date
  • Tags Tags
    Correction Decay Muon
Click For Summary

Discussion Overview

The discussion revolves around the derivation and origin of the correction factor for the muon decay width, specifically comparing the basic formula with a more complex version that includes corrections due to the electron mass. Participants explore the theoretical underpinnings and calculations involved in determining the decay width.

Discussion Character

  • Technical explanation
  • Exploratory
  • Debate/contested

Main Points Raised

  • One participant presents the basic muon decay width formula and questions the origin of the correction factor found in Wikipedia.
  • Another participant explains that the muon decay rate is derived from evaluating a Feynman diagram, noting the complexity involved in integrating over the decay products' energies and angles.
  • A participant points out that under the assumption that the electron mass is negligible compared to the muon mass, the correction factor simplifies to approximately 1.
  • Another participant elaborates on the calculation process, mentioning the importance of tree-level amplitudes and the need to consider loop corrections for more accurate results.
  • One participant clarifies that the corrections discussed are phase space corrections due to the electron's mass, rather than loop corrections, indicating a misunderstanding in the previous responses.
  • A later reply acknowledges a mistake regarding the reference link, suggesting a need for careful review of sources.

Areas of Agreement / Disagreement

Participants express differing views on the nature of the corrections involved, with some emphasizing loop corrections while others argue they are phase space corrections. The discussion remains unresolved regarding the precise classification of these corrections.

Contextual Notes

Participants note the complexity of the calculations involved, including the integration over multiple variables and the assumptions made regarding the electron mass. There is also mention of the dimensionality of the corrections, which remains a point of contention.

Catria
Messages
145
Reaction score
4
In my class notes, the muon decay width is:

\Gamma_\mu=\frac{G^2_F m^5_\mu}{192\pi^3}

Yet, in Wikipedia (take that for what it's worth) it says that, once the corrections have been applied, the muon decay width takes the form:

\Gamma_\mu=\frac{G^2_F m^5_\mu}{192\pi^3}I\left(\frac{m^2_e}{m^2_\mu}\right)

where

I(x)=1-8x-12x^2 ln(x)+8x^3+x^4 is a correction factor.

I wonder how does one arrive at that correction factor. If it is possible to get enough steps so that someone could understand its origin, as well as understanding its derivation, it would be very appreciated.
 
Physics news on Phys.org
Catria, The muon decay rate is calculated from evaluation of a Feynman diagram -- simple in principle but complicated in practice. Here's a paper describing in general terms how one does it. (Note especially Eq 44.) The calculation for muon decay involves a three-particle final state, and the energies and angles of all three decay products must be integrated over to get the total decay rate.

It simplifies a lot if you neglect the mass of the electron, giving the answer from your class notes. The "corrected" version in Wikipedia is the full result.
 
Note that (me/mμ)² << 1, so that I(x)≈I(0)=1.
 
Like bill says, as you probably know from your post, you calculate the amplitude at tree level. Then one can improve the calculation by adding the correction factor.

Of course one first calculates the largest correction first.

To do this, you have to extend the Feynman diagram literature to loop level and perform integrals over loop momentum.

In decays, these are regularized by the massive exchange particle. Anyway, it is these loop integrals that give you these ratios and logarithms.
 
These are not loop corrections. These are phase space corrections - due to the fact that the electron has a tiny mass. These have the wrong dimensionality to be loop corrections.
 
Oops. I should have looked at the link before replying.
 

Similar threads

  • · Replies 13 ·
Replies
13
Views
5K
  • · Replies 0 ·
Replies
0
Views
3K
  • · Replies 0 ·
Replies
0
Views
4K
Replies
14
Views
3K
  • · Replies 1 ·
Replies
1
Views
2K
  • · Replies 9 ·
Replies
9
Views
13K
  • · Replies 6 ·
Replies
6
Views
3K
  • · Replies 1 ·
Replies
1
Views
2K
  • · Replies 83 ·
3
Replies
83
Views
15K
  • · Replies 49 ·
2
Replies
49
Views
13K