My stupid question about particle-wave duality

  • Context: Undergrad 
  • Thread starter Thread starter danihel
  • Start date Start date
  • Tags Tags
    Duality Stupid
Click For Summary
SUMMARY

The discussion centers on the concept of particle-wave duality and the phenomenon of decoherence in quantum mechanics. The original poster questions whether particles always propagate as waves and if decoherence merely selects a new localized source of wave propagation. The response emphasizes that personal speculations are not appropriate in a physics forum and encourages seeking a deeper understanding of quantum mechanics through established principles. The thread was ultimately closed due to the speculative nature of the questions posed.

PREREQUISITES
  • Understanding of quantum mechanics principles
  • Familiarity with the concept of wave functions
  • Knowledge of decoherence in quantum systems
  • Basic grasp of particle-wave duality
NEXT STEPS
  • Study the mathematical formulation of wave functions in quantum mechanics
  • Learn about the process and implications of quantum decoherence
  • Explore the historical context and experiments related to particle-wave duality
  • Investigate the role of measurement in quantum mechanics
USEFUL FOR

Students of physics, quantum mechanics enthusiasts, and researchers interested in the foundational concepts of particle-wave duality and decoherence.

danihel
Messages
39
Reaction score
0
Again, my knowledge of quantum physics is so poor, I have no reference to give me any idea about the measure of stupidity of this question, so please bear with me.:

Could it be that the nature of a ‘particle’ doesn’t change? That when decoherence occurs the wave function collapses into a new very localized source of wave propagation?
That every particle pretty much is and always propagates as a wave and decoherence only selects a new point of a source of a wave? Is this a valid way of thinking about it?

Perhaps decoherence is a phenomenon somewhat similar to when solar magnetic field lines get too convoluted and snap and reset into a simpler form? Another question I have is: Does decoherence occur gradually somehow or is it literally instantaneous?
 
Physics news on Phys.org
In the famous words of Pauli, this is "not even wrong."

PhysicsForums is not the place for personal speculations. If you want to learn actual quantum mechanics, there are plenty of people here who will gladly help you.

Thread closed.
 

Similar threads

  • · Replies 2 ·
Replies
2
Views
2K
  • · Replies 36 ·
2
Replies
36
Views
9K
  • · Replies 38 ·
2
Replies
38
Views
6K
  • · Replies 17 ·
Replies
17
Views
3K
  • · Replies 19 ·
Replies
19
Views
7K
  • · Replies 1 ·
Replies
1
Views
1K
  • · Replies 1 ·
Replies
1
Views
2K
  • · Replies 39 ·
2
Replies
39
Views
9K
  • · Replies 90 ·
4
Replies
90
Views
9K
  • · Replies 30 ·
2
Replies
30
Views
4K