Myers-Briggs Type Indicator and Physicists

  • Thread starter Thread starter hddnvariables
  • Start date Start date
  • Tags Tags
    Physicists Type
Click For Summary
SUMMARY

The discussion centers on the correlation between the Myers-Briggs Type Indicator (MBTI) and career choices in science, particularly among physicists. Participants express skepticism about the validity of the MBTI, noting its criticisms and limitations as a psychological tool. The INTJ personality type, often associated with logical thinking, is highlighted as potentially more prevalent in scientific fields, although its overall population is low. The conversation emphasizes that while the MBTI may be entertaining, it should not be taken seriously in professional contexts.

PREREQUISITES
  • Understanding of the Myers-Briggs Type Indicator (MBTI)
  • Basic knowledge of personality psychology
  • Familiarity with career paths in science
  • Awareness of psychological test criticisms
NEXT STEPS
  • Research the validity and reliability of the Myers-Briggs Type Indicator
  • Explore alternative personality assessments, such as the Big Five personality traits
  • Investigate the relationship between personality types and career satisfaction in STEM fields
  • Examine the impact of personality on team dynamics in scientific research
USEFUL FOR

Psychologists, career counselors, educators, and individuals interested in the intersection of personality and career choices in the sciences.

hddnvariables
Messages
8
Reaction score
0
Although it's not my area of expertise I sometimes like to delve into a bit of Psychology. I came across the Myers-Briggs Type Indicator(mbti) a while ago and liked finding connections between it and other areas such as political affiliation. I was wondering if anyone here thought that there was any correlation between mbti and going into science as a career. I guess an xNTx(the Intellectuals) would probably be the best in this area as they are often viewed as logical. The low number of this group compared to the overall population would probably also explain why the sciences aren't as popular as some other careers. I am an INTJ so I might be kind of biased here. Any thoughts?
 
Physics news on Phys.org
The Meyers-Briggs Type Indicator has been criticized a lot: http://www.skepdic.com/myersb.html
I tend to agree with the criticism. It's sad how many people still use such a flawed test.
 
micromass said:
The Meyers-Briggs Type Indicator has been criticized a lot: http://www.skepdic.com/myersb.html
I tend to agree with the criticism. It's sad how many people still use such a flawed test.
I've always considered it as one of those fun tests you take like "Do I have a tapeworm" or "Is my cat trying to kill me". It doesn't mean anything. Well, except having a tapeworm could be bad.

I agree people should not take these tests seriously, they're for entertainment, even though some people try to pretend they're not.
 

Similar threads

  • · Replies 23 ·
Replies
23
Views
11K
Replies
10
Views
2K
  • · Replies 0 ·
Replies
0
Views
1K
Replies
5
Views
7K
Replies
16
Views
2K
  • · Replies 2 ·
Replies
2
Views
1K
  • · Replies 19 ·
Replies
19
Views
3K
  • · Replies 49 ·
2
Replies
49
Views
5K
  • · Replies 4 ·
Replies
4
Views
3K
  • · Replies 1 ·
Replies
1
Views
2K