MHB Mylesbibbs' question at Yahoo Answers regarding marginal cost

  • Thread starter Thread starter MarkFL
  • Start date Start date
  • Tags Tags
    Marginal
AI Thread Summary
The cost function for producing automobile tires is given as C(q) = 2300 + 15q - 0.01q², where q represents the number of tires produced. To find the rate of change of cost with respect to time, the chain rule is applied, resulting in dC/dt = (15 - 0.02q)(dq/dt). With dq/dt set at 30 tires per week and q at 400, the calculation shows that dC/dt equals $210. Therefore, the production cost is increasing at a rate of $210 per week.
MarkFL
Gold Member
MHB
Messages
13,284
Reaction score
12
Here is the question:

CALC. HELP! Related Problems!?!?

The weekly cost C, in dollars, for a manufacturer to produce q automobile tires is given by
C = 2300 + 15q − 0.01q2 0 ≤ q ≤ 800.
If 400 tires are currently being made per week but production levels are increasing at a rate of 30 tires/week, compute the rate of change of cost with respect to time.

Here is a link to the question:

CALC. HELP! Related Problems!?!? - Yahoo! Answers

I have posted a link there to this topic so the OP can find my response.
 
Mathematics news on Phys.org
Hello mylesbibbs,

We are given:

[math]C(q)=2300+15q−0.01q^2[/math]

and we are asked to find [math]\frac{dC}{dt}[/math]

Now, if we take the given cost function and differentiate with respect to time, using the chain rule we find:

[math]\frac{dC}{dt}=\frac{dC}{dq}\cdot\frac{dq}{dt}= \left(15-0.02q \right)\frac{dq}{dt}[/math]

We are also told that [math]\frac{dq}{dt}=30[/math] and so we have:

[math]\frac{dC}{dt}=30(15-0.02q)[/math]

and so at the current production level of $q=400$, we find:

[math]\left.\frac{dC}{dt}\right|_{q=400}=30(15-0.02\cdot400)=210[/math]

Thus, we find that the production cost is increasing at a rate of \$210 per week.

To mylesbibbs and any other guests viewing this topic, I invite and encourage you to post other marginal cost questions here in our http://www.mathhelpboards.com/f10/ forum.

Best Regards,

Mark.
 
Seemingly by some mathematical coincidence, a hexagon of sides 2,2,7,7, 11, and 11 can be inscribed in a circle of radius 7. The other day I saw a math problem on line, which they said came from a Polish Olympiad, where you compute the length x of the 3rd side which is the same as the radius, so that the sides of length 2,x, and 11 are inscribed on the arc of a semi-circle. The law of cosines applied twice gives the answer for x of exactly 7, but the arithmetic is so complex that the...
Thread 'Video on imaginary numbers and some queries'
Hi, I was watching the following video. I found some points confusing. Could you please help me to understand the gaps? Thanks, in advance! Question 1: Around 4:22, the video says the following. So for those mathematicians, negative numbers didn't exist. You could subtract, that is find the difference between two positive quantities, but you couldn't have a negative answer or negative coefficients. Mathematicians were so averse to negative numbers that there was no single quadratic...
Thread 'Unit Circle Double Angle Derivations'
Here I made a terrible mistake of assuming this to be an equilateral triangle and set 2sinx=1 => x=pi/6. Although this did derive the double angle formulas it also led into a terrible mess trying to find all the combinations of sides. I must have been tired and just assumed 6x=180 and 2sinx=1. By that time, I was so mindset that I nearly scolded a person for even saying 90-x. I wonder if this is a case of biased observation that seeks to dis credit me like Jesus of Nazareth since in reality...
Back
Top