Name for a subset of real space being nowhere a manifold with boundary

Click For Summary

Discussion Overview

The discussion revolves around identifying a specific term for a subset of real space that is not a manifold with boundary. Participants explore the properties of such sets, particularly focusing on conditions where local homeomorphism to Euclidean spaces or half-spaces does not hold.

Discussion Character

  • Exploratory, Technical explanation, Debate/contested

Main Points Raised

  • One participant inquires about a name for a subset S of \(\mathbb{R}^n\) that lacks local homeomorphic properties to either \(\mathbb{R}^m\) or the half-space \(\mathbb{H}^m\) for any integer \(m \geq 0\).
  • Another participant suggests that the complement of a dense set might be relevant to the original question.
  • A participant refines their question, indicating that while the complement of a dense set could be a correct answer for the case where \(m = n\), it does not hold for general \(m\). They provide an example involving the graph of a nowhere continuous function.
  • Further reflection leads to the conclusion that the half-space condition may be unnecessary, as local isomorphism to a half-space implies isomorphism to Euclidean space nearby.
  • Participants acknowledge a misunderstanding regarding the condition \(m \neq n\) and express that it was not included in the original formulation.
  • One participant maintains that the complement of a dense set is still a necessary condition, but notes that not every complement of a dense set is suitable, citing the example of \(\{0\}\).

Areas of Agreement / Disagreement

Participants express differing views on the correct characterization of the set in question, with no consensus reached on a specific term or definition. The discussion remains unresolved regarding the properties and naming of such sets.

Contextual Notes

Participants note limitations in their definitions and examples, particularly regarding the necessity of the half-space condition and the implications of the complement of a dense set. The discussion reflects ongoing exploration rather than established conclusions.

disregardthat
Science Advisor
Messages
1,864
Reaction score
34
I was wondering if anyone knew of a name for such a set, namely a subset S \subseteq \mathbb{R}^n which at every point x \in S there exists no open subset U of \mathbb{R}^n containing x such that S \cap U is homeomorphic to either \mathbb{R}^m or the half-space \mathbb{H}^m = \{(y_1,...,y_m) \in \mathbb{R}^m : y_m \geq 0\} for any integer m \geq 0. Of course, any set for which such open sets U exists for every x is called an embedded manifold with boundary. I'm looking for the opposite notion, in a sense.
 
Last edited:
Physics news on Phys.org
The complement of a dense set?
 
I've corrected my question a bit, it now more accurately reflects the title. The complement of a dense set for the original question (where m had the fixed value n) could very well be the correct answer. I can't prove it right now, but I'll look into it. For general m however, it's not the right notion. For example, I'd like the graph of a nowhere continuous function to fit the bill, but not the graph of a continuous function.

EDIT: Upon some further reflection it dawns on me that the half-space condition is unecessary. If a space is isomorphic to the half-space locally around any point, then it is necessarily isomorphic to euclidean space at a nearby point. Hence the half-space condition can be dropped entirely without changing the question.
 
Last edited:
I missed the ##m \neq n## idea, sorry.
 
Office_Shredder said:
I missed the ##m \neq n## idea, sorry.

It was my fault, I didn't include it in the original formulation :smile:
 
It still needs to be the complement of a dense set I think, but not every complement works (because {0} is the complement of a dense set for example).
 

Similar threads

  • · Replies 11 ·
Replies
11
Views
1K
  • · Replies 13 ·
Replies
13
Views
6K
  • · Replies 20 ·
Replies
20
Views
4K
  • · Replies 12 ·
Replies
12
Views
3K
  • · Replies 2 ·
Replies
2
Views
2K
  • · Replies 2 ·
Replies
2
Views
2K
  • · Replies 2 ·
Replies
2
Views
3K
  • · Replies 5 ·
Replies
5
Views
1K
  • · Replies 3 ·
Replies
3
Views
3K
  • · Replies 15 ·
Replies
15
Views
3K