Nanotechnology and RNA to Protein

In summary, the conversation discusses the potential of using synthetic biology and bionanotechnology to design and manufacture nano-scale machines. This involves understanding protein folding and utilizing DNA and RNA to create structures, as well as exploiting viruses as self-assembling machines. However, this field requires crossdisciplinary expertise, with collaboration between biology, physical chemistry, physics, and computational biology labs.
  • #1
nobahar
497
2
Hello!

I'm guessing nanotechnology poses many difficulties, especially when using synthetic materials to manufacture complicated machines on such a small scale. I was thinking, therefore, that, if the mechanisms of protein folding are figured out, then mRNA sequences can be designed to produce 'designed' proteins. The manufacture of these tiny machines can be undertaken by ribosomes. Although I guess that is only part of the problem. Designing the protein is the other difficulty.
Nonetheless, is there a role for usurping biological methods for making such small scale 'machines', as proteins often are, in the field of nanotechnology? Designing RNA sequences and using either natural or synthetic ribosomes to construct the desired machine?

Hmmmmm. Interesting?

Nobahar.
 
Biology news on Phys.org
  • #2
Exploiting the abilities of biological molecules to self-assemble into nano-scale materials is a very exciting area of research that many labs are currently working on.

In the area of proteins, protein folding is very complicated, and while scientists have determined some of the basic principles that dictate protein folding, we are still very far away from being able to design proteins to perform any arbitrary function. That said, there have been a number of successes where scientists have been able to computationally design new protein folds (Kuhlman et al. 2003 Design of a novel globular protein fold with atomic-level accuracy. Science 302:1364-8) and even design new enzymes (Rothlisberger et al. 2008 Kemp elimination catalysts by computational enzyme design. Nature, 453:164-6; Jiang et al. 2008 De novo computational design of retro-aldol enzymes. Science, 319:1387-91). However, these enzymes are still much less efficient than their natural counterparts and they catalyze fairly simple reactions. Much research is still required to figure out how to improve our methods of designing enzymes.

DNA and RNA folding, however, follow much simpler rules than protein folding and researchers have been able to make significant progress in creating arbitrary DNA nanostructures. Researchers have developed a technique called DNA origami that can essentially allow the construction of arbitary 2D (Rothemund. 2006 Folding DNA to create nanoscale shapes and patterns Nature 440:297-302) and 3D shapes (Douglas et al. 2009 Self-assembly of DNA into nanoscale three-dimensional shapes. Nature 459:414-8). There is even freely-available software to help researchers design 3D DNA nanostructures (http://cadnano.org/). Of course, while DNA and RNA are very good tools for fabricating nanostructures, it is much more difficult to make them functional (e.g. to act as catalysts or to act as sensors).

On a larger, more integrated level, researchers have also been able to exploit viruses as self-assembling, self-replicating nanoscale machines for synthesizing new materials (Mao et al. 2004 Virus-Based Genetic Toolkit for the Directed Synthesis of Magnetic and Semiconducting Nanowires. Science 303: 213-5; Lee et al. 2009 Fabricating Genetically Engineered High-Power Lithium Ion Batteries Using Multiple Virus Genes. Science 324: 1051-5).
 
  • #3
Synthetic biology offers huge advances in our ability to manufacture new toys. Two cool things that spring to my mind is the http://scitechstory.com/2010/02/17/code-4-letter-codons/" [Broken].
 
Last edited by a moderator:
  • #4
Ygggdrasil said:
In the area of proteins, protein folding is very complicated, and while scientists have determined some of the basic principles that dictate protein folding, we are still very far away from being able to design proteins to perform any arbitrary function. That said, there have been a number of successes where scientists have been able to computationally design new protein folds

Thanks for the response Ygggdrasil and Ryan. There are some interesting articles there to look through. I think this is an extremely interesting area of biology; although, judging from the articles, it seems to fall more into the realm of Physical chemistry and physics than biology. The Kuhlman article was impenetrable. How much crossdisciplinary knowledge would one be expected to have, out of interest?
 
  • #5
I would say that most areas of biology require some crossdisciplinary knowledge, but this is especially true in the area of synthetic biology. For example, the 2008 papers describing computational design of enzymes were a collaboration between four groups: the Baker lab at the University of Washington, a computational biology group that has developed software for predicting and designing protein structures; the Houk lab at UCLA, a computational chemistry lab that has developed tools for performing quantum mechanical calculations to study catalysts; the Stoddard lab at the University of Washington, a structural biology lab that figures out the 3D structures of proteins using x-ray crystallography; and the Tawfik lab at the Weizmann Institute in Israel, a biochemistry group that studies the evolution of enzymes. The computational methods from the Houk lab were needed to correctly design the active site of the protein so that it can perform the correct reaction, and the computational methods from the Baker lab were needed to optimize the rest of the protein structure to position the active site residues in the correct position. They then turned to the expertise of the Stoddard lab to characterize their designed proteins and determine whether they folded into the correct structure, and then to the expertise of the Tawfik lab to use directed evolution methods to fine tune the activity of the designed enzymes.

Because these types of projects require considerable crossdisciplinary expertise, they are rarely ever undertaken by a single individual or even a single lab (at least until the methods are mature enough that they can be performed by non-experts). It is important, however, that all involved have a strong grounding in all of the different disciplines involved so that everyone can at least "speak in the same language" (which can sometimes be a problem when biologists speak to physicists).
 
  • #6
Ygggdrasil said:
Because these types of projects require considerable crossdisciplinary expertise, they are rarely ever undertaken by a single individual or even a single lab (at least until the methods are mature enough that they can be performed by non-experts). It is important, however, that all involved have a strong grounding in all of the different disciplines involved so that everyone can at least "speak in the same language" (which can sometimes be a problem when biologists speak to physicists).

Interdisciplinary collaboration is a must for projects in synthetic biology and bionanotechnology. I have some personal experience of this; my undergrad was straight biology and in the life science school all departments were separated by areas of study and all labs separated by specific elements. This meant that a biochemist in the e.coli labs would only ever see a developmental biologist from the d.melanogaster labs if they walked through the buildings front door at the same time. And these are just scientists within life science; material scientists, engineers, physicists etc all had buildings elsewhere.

Obviously this is a fairly standard set up and I never thought too much about it (after all if you needed a physicist you could visit/email and consult one) however in my post graduate the departments were arranged by what their research interest was and packed with staff from every arena. This meant that my department (Surgery and Interventional science) was dedicated towards regenerative medicine approaches to prosthetics and employed biochemists, material scientists, mechanical engineers, polymer scientists etc. This was an eye opener for me as to how different and more comprehensive research could be when everyone has a different background.
 

1. What is nanotechnology and how does it relate to RNA to protein?

Nanotechnology is the study and manipulation of materials at the nanoscale, which is on the order of 1 to 100 nanometers. RNA to protein refers to the process of converting genetic information encoded in RNA into functional proteins. Nanotechnology can be used to design and create nanoscale tools and structures that can assist in this process, such as nanoparticles that can deliver RNA or proteins to specific cells or tissues.

2. How does nanotechnology improve the delivery of RNA to protein?

Nanoparticles can be designed with specific surface properties and functional groups that allow them to efficiently deliver RNA to cells. Nanotechnology also allows for the precise control of the size and shape of nanoparticles, which can impact their ability to penetrate cell membranes and deliver their cargo. Additionally, nanotechnology can be used to protect RNA from degradation by enzymes, increasing its stability and effectiveness in protein synthesis.

3. What are some potential applications of using nanotechnology in RNA to protein conversion?

Nanotechnology has many potential applications in this field, including the development of targeted drug delivery systems, gene therapy treatments, and biosensors for detecting specific proteins. It can also aid in the production of proteins for medical and industrial use, as well as in the study and understanding of biological processes.

4. Are there any potential risks associated with using nanotechnology in RNA to protein conversion?

While nanotechnology has many potential benefits, there are also potential risks that need to be carefully considered. These include unintended interactions with biological systems, potential toxicity of nanoparticles, and the potential for nanoparticles to accumulate in the environment. Research is ongoing to better understand and mitigate these risks.

5. How is nanotechnology being used in current research on RNA to protein conversion?

Nanotechnology is being used in a variety of ways in current research on RNA to protein conversion. Some examples include the use of nanoparticles to deliver RNA-based therapeutics for diseases such as cancer, the development of nanoscale biosensors for detecting protein interactions, and the use of nanodevices to manipulate and control RNA molecules in the lab. Additionally, nanotechnology is being used to improve our understanding of the complex processes involved in RNA to protein conversion.

Similar threads

  • Biology and Medical
Replies
4
Views
2K
Replies
2
Views
5K
  • Biology and Chemistry Homework Help
Replies
2
Views
7K
  • Art, Music, History, and Linguistics
Replies
1
Views
999
  • Biology and Medical
Replies
5
Views
3K
  • Science and Math Textbooks
Replies
17
Views
7K
Back
Top