Narcotics and how they affect the body.

  • Thread starter Thread starter munky99999
  • Start date Start date
  • Tags Tags
    Body
Click For Summary

Discussion Overview

The discussion focuses on the effects of narcotics on the body, exploring their chemical mechanisms, potential for addiction, and the possibility of designing drugs that provide desired effects without negative consequences. It encompasses theoretical, biochemical, and conceptual aspects of narcotics and their classifications.

Discussion Character

  • Exploratory
  • Technical explanation
  • Debate/contested
  • Conceptual clarification

Main Points Raised

  • Some participants seek a detailed biochemical explanation of how narcotics induce euphoria and other effects.
  • One participant suggests that narcotics may work by tampering with oxygen flow or altering neuronal firing patterns.
  • Another participant explains that drugs like THC bind to specific receptors in the brain, emphasizing the importance of molecular size and solubility for crossing the blood-brain barrier.
  • There is mention of the complexity of drug interactions with receptors and the potential for designing drugs that mimic effects without negative side effects.
  • Participants discuss the evolving definition of narcotics, noting that it now often includes a broader range of substances beyond traditional opiates.
  • One participant raises the idea of a universal drug for addiction treatment, while another counters that specific drugs target specific receptors, suggesting no universal solution exists.
  • There is a discussion about the classification of marijuana and its effects, with some participants noting that it does not fit the traditional definition of narcotics.
  • Concerns are raised about the side effects of drugs and whether they can be effectively managed in drug design.
  • One participant mentions that some narcotics are also poisons and questions whether they damage the body through similar mechanisms as narcotics.

Areas of Agreement / Disagreement

Participants express a range of views on the mechanisms of narcotics, their classifications, and the potential for drug design. There is no consensus on the existence of a universal drug for addiction treatment, and the discussion remains unresolved regarding the definitions and classifications of narcotics.

Contextual Notes

Some claims about the biochemical mechanisms of narcotics depend on specific definitions and assumptions about drug classifications. The discussion includes varying interpretations of what constitutes a narcotic and the implications of drug interactions.

munky99999
Messages
200
Reaction score
0
well I am not looking for the

"Drugs are bad mmmmKayyy" speech.

Im looking for more of a detailed explanation on how drugs(narcotics) do those psychedelic euphoria stimulant. How the effect is done chemically. and what specifically in the chemicals that make the effect.
 
Chemistry news on Phys.org
There are probably more, but I only know of 2 ways narcotics seem to work.
1). Tamper with the way oxygen flows through your body
2). Screw up the way neurons fire

Messing with oxygen would be things like carbon dioxide, carbon monoxide, and cyanide. Screwing with neurons would be things like ether, gasoline, and chloroform.
 
we really need to get a biochemist on these forums. from what I know from my job, drugs like THC work by binding to a specific receptor in your body (CB1 receptor for THC) which are found in the brain. The drug is able to bind to the receptor in the brain if the drug is able to cross the BBB , (blood brain barrier). Any molecules with molecular weight of >500 dalton 99.9% of the time are probably not going to be able to cross the BBB. not only does the molecule have to be <500 daltons, it also has to be fairly water soluble. The molecule also has to fit very well into a receptor pocket in order for it to have an effect. think of the receptor as a lock and the drug as a key. the drug will only work if the key fits the lock. drugs like heroin and morphine are almost identical, except for the fact that heroin has only 2 more CH3COO groups. that slight change in chemistry effects receptor to which heroin and morphine bind. once the drug crosses the bbb and binds to the receptor, it over stimulates the receptors in your brain giving you the feeling of getting high. Pharmacology/medicinal chemistry is a very interesting field, the complexity of the human body is astounding when you really get into the nitty gritty details. that is all i really know. they really don't teach you this stuff in school as a traditional undergraduate.
 
personally i was really interested in biochemistry. and they got all new equipment and everything for the course in the university when i was in grade 11. But the problem. my teacher essentially was a slacker. everyday it was powerpoint presentations and she simply read completely off the presentation. and what did we have to do? copy the words down and memorise. and when you were interested in further information not included. For example we were doing all the types of cells and how they differ. I asked for specifics like. how long do certain cells last. I knew blood was 110 days(or so). and the answers weren't in the textbook. My teacher's answer to my question was. "Check your textbook." I replied "The answers arent in the textbook. she replied "Too bad i guess."

So i basically dropped biology. Terrible teacher.

though. I am really interested in if it were possible to design a drug. which gives the hallucinogenic effects of narcotics. but no negative effects. like screwed up brain chemistry or becoming addicted.
 
Technically, narcotics are drugs that induce sleep or stupor. "Narkos" would be greek for "sleep." So Tylenol PM would be a narcotic, all though it's more commonly used to refer to the opiates, like heroin or morphine (from Morpheus, greek god of dreams).

Unfortunately, 'narcotics' more commonly refers now to just any illicit drug. So crystal meth is called a narcotic, even though it does the opposite of inducing sleep. Or cocaine, or paint thinner.

There's all sorts of modes of action for various illicit drugs, which is what I think you mean by "narcotics."

Things like carbon dioxide or gas fumes simply displace oxygen, so your lungs can't get any. Carbon monoxide binds to hemoglobin, so that oxygen can't bind. Cyanide inhibits the electron transport chain, so even if you get oxygen to the cells, you can respire.

But most illicit drugs are substrates for specific enzymes, often surface receptors.

The opiates, for instance, inhibit certain receptors in the central nervous system, producing effects like stupor and analgesia.

Can you tailor make drugs for certain effects? Certainly. It's a multi-billion dollar industry.

methadone is essentially heroin that's been chemically altered to reduce the euphoric effect, satisfy the addiction, and metabolise more slowly so that you don't get the big, swinging highs and lows that you do with heroin. Which is why methadone is so good in treating heroin addiction.
 
methadone is wat i had in mind. but i was thinking a more universal drug. not just a heroine alt. I've also had this sort of in mind in my addiction thread. I've been trying to understand if addiction is more a universal thing. regardless to the chemical that intiated, that its still the same all around biochemically. and from what that thread is saying. it seems that much is possible. which explains somewhat why people who drop one drug and move to another don't get withdrawls(at least as far as i know).

Technically, narcotics are drugs that induce sleep or stupor.
So if i fake insomnia, i can have medicinal marijuana? :bugeye: :smile:

if i ever goto a psychologist or something. i think i might try that joke with them.

Can you tailor make drugs for certain effects? Certainly. It's a multi-billion dollar industry.
well the effects isn't in question. its the after effects. which they don't seem to figure out how to do very well.

another bad joke:
Unabptril, it cures your runny nose. It will clear it very quick. After results diarhea, death, kidney failure, sars, cancer, aids, leprosy, and the bubonic plague.
 
munky99999 said:
methadone is wat i had in mind. but i was thinking a more universal drug. not just a heroine alt. I've also had this sort of in mind in my addiction thread. I've been trying to understand if addiction is more a universal thing. regardless to the chemical that intiated, that its still the same all around biochemically. and from what that thread is saying. it seems that much is possible.

Then you may have misread the thread, since that's not what you're saying. Since specific drugs affect specific receptors, there can be no universal drug.

which explains somewhat why people who drop one drug and move to another don't get withdrawls(at least as far as i know).

If a heroin addict decided to stop taking heroin, and started smoking marijuana, they'd still get heroin withdrawals. A heroin addict can switch to methadone because they still affect the same receptors.


So if i fake insomnia, i can have medicinal marijuana? :bugeye: :smile:

if i ever goto a psychologist or something. i think i might try that joke with them.

Marijuana isn't a narcotic, technically, as it doesn't induce sleep.


well the effects isn't in question. its the after effects. which they don't seem to figure out how to do very well.

I'm not following. An "after effect" is still an effect.

another bad joke:
Unabptril, it cures your runny nose. It will clear it very quick. After results diarhea, death, kidney failure, sars, cancer, aids, leprosy, and the bubonic plague.
......
 
well the effects isn't in question. its the after effects. which they don't seem to figure out how to do very well.

I'm not following. An "after effect" is still an effect.
Side effect?
 
anyway. to continue in my studies. I've found a few narcotics are actually poisons. or rather poisons that have narcotic parts.

anyhow putting aside bacterial poisons and putting aside poisons like arsenic which screw up the chemical cycles.

do the narcotic poisons do their damage through doing as narcotics do. which is attack these said receptors? and more specifically. and these poisons are the considered neuropoisons/toxins?
 
  • #10
TRCSF said:
Unfortunately, 'narcotics' more commonly refers now to just any illicit drug. So crystal meth is called a narcotic, even though it does the opposite of inducing sleep. Or cocaine, or paint thinner.
Paint thinner actually is a narcotic. If you inhale it, it will definitely make you sleepy. Pretty much all organic solvents do that. I think paint thinner is or was methylene chloride (may have changed since the Montreal Protocol).
 
  • #11
ShawnD said:
Paint thinner actually is a narcotic. If you inhale it, it will definitely make you sleepy. Pretty much all organic solvents do that. I think paint thinner is or was methylene chloride (may have changed since the Montreal Protocol).

Well organic solvents will asphyxiate you and cause you to pass out. I don't really think that's the same thing as inducing sleep though.
 
  • #12
If they don't kill you, you're just sleeping :wink:
 

Similar threads

  • · Replies 14 ·
Replies
14
Views
3K
  • · Replies 3 ·
Replies
3
Views
5K
  • · Replies 8 ·
Replies
8
Views
3K
  • · Replies 19 ·
Replies
19
Views
10K
  • · Replies 21 ·
Replies
21
Views
7K
Replies
13
Views
3K
Replies
12
Views
6K
  • · Replies 7 ·
Replies
7
Views
2K
Replies
4
Views
6K
Replies
3
Views
2K