NASA NASA - Venus Technology Plan (DRAFT) December, 2018

Click For Summary
The discussion focuses on the challenges and considerations for operating a nuclear reactor on Venus, given its extreme surface conditions of approximately 470°C and 93 bar pressure. Participants highlight the potential of using an open Brayton cycle for energy generation, akin to jet engines. The Venus Exploration Analysis Group (VEXAG) is working on updating scientific priorities for Venus exploration, which includes a comprehensive Technology Plan aimed at enhancing future missions. Key areas of focus include developing high-temperature subsystems for long-duration operations, aerial platforms for atmospheric measurements, and in situ instruments for landed missions. The ongoing efforts emphasize the need for innovative technologies to explore and understand Venus effectively.
Astronuc
Staff Emeritus
Science Advisor
Gold Member
Messages
22,442
Reaction score
7,352
This discussion relates to another thread on the feasibility of operating a nuclear reactor on Venus.
https://www.physicsforums.com/threa...ure-nuclear-reactor-operate-in-venus.1003619/

Venus represents a hostile environment with a surface temperature of ~470°C and pressure of 93 bar (1,350 psi), with a composition of 0.965 CO2, 0.035 N2, and traces of other gases like SO2, Ar, H2O, CO, . . . . Yet, there are folks giving it serious consideration.
https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Atmosphere_of_Venus

I'd recommend an open Brayton cycle, as in a jet engine-rocket motor.

The Venus Exploration Analysis Group (VEXAG) resolved to update the scientific priorities and strategies for Venus exploration. To achieve this goal, three major tasks were defined to update: (1) the document prioritizing Goals, Objectives and Investigations for Venus Exploration: (GOI), (2) the Roadmap for Venus Exploration (RVE) that is consistent with VEXAG priorities as well as Planetary Decadal Survey priorities, and (3) the Technology Plan for future Venus missions. Here, we present the 2018 Venus Technology Plan.

https://www.lpi.usra.edu/vexag/reports/Venus-Technology-Plan-DRAFT-V1.pdf

Of interest are the areas of:
2. High-Temperature Subsystems and Components for Long-Duration (months) Surface Operations
3. Aerial Platforms for Missions to Measure Atmospheric Chemical and Physical Properties
4. In Situ Instruments for Landed Missions

Draft 2014 - https://www.lpi.usra.edu/vexag/reports/Venus-Technology-Plan-140617.pdf

Draft 2019 - https://www.lpi.usra.edu/vexag/reports/Venus-Technology-Plan-Final-Draft-070119.pdf

pdf - https://www.nationalacademies.org/event/10-20-2020/docs/D25349F5A7C9976B74F8D803827E58401D75255C2C09

Enjoy reading and learning.
 
Last edited:
Thread 'General principle of turbomachinery: true also for rocket turbopumps?'
A rule of thumb of aircraft engineers is every 10% increase in the power level engines are run at corresponds to a 50% decrease in engine lifetime. This is a general phenomenon of turbomachinery. Then it is likely it also holds for rocket turbopumps. Then quite key is the rule also holds in reverse, every decrease in power level by 10% can result in doubling the lifetime of the engine. Then by running the engine at 0.9^5 = 0.60 power level can result in 2^5 = 32 times longer lifetime. For...

Similar threads

  • · Replies 1 ·
Replies
1
Views
4K
  • · Replies 25 ·
Replies
25
Views
4K
  • · Replies 0 ·
Replies
0
Views
2K
  • · Replies 7 ·
Replies
7
Views
1K
  • · Replies 2 ·
Replies
2
Views
1K
Replies
1
Views
1K
  • · Replies 45 ·
2
Replies
45
Views
12K
Replies
2
Views
4K
Replies
1
Views
5K
  • · Replies 4 ·
Replies
4
Views
7K