Natural frequency of beam exposed to sinusoidal force

Click For Summary

Discussion Overview

The discussion revolves around the natural frequency of beams, particularly in the context of vibrations and the effects of sinusoidal forces. Participants explore the implications of applying sinusoidal loads versus axial loads and the methods to analyze beam responses using partial differential equations (PDEs).

Discussion Character

  • Exploratory
  • Technical explanation
  • Debate/contested
  • Homework-related

Main Points Raised

  • One participant presents an equation for natural frequencies of a simply supported beam under axial load and questions its applicability when the load is sinusoidal.
  • Another participant clarifies that natural frequencies pertain to free vibrations and do not directly indicate the actual motion under time-varying forces.
  • It is suggested that the response to sinusoidal forces would require a different analysis, potentially involving numerical methods like finite element modeling.
  • Questions arise about how to determine which vibration modes are significant for the beam's motion and whether some modes can be considered negligible.
  • A participant discusses the transformation of equations of motion to modal forms, emphasizing that modes with zero displacement in a direction will not be excited by forces in that direction.
  • A student requests assistance with a specific homework problem involving a vibrating beam and the use of a piezoelectric accelerometer, seeking help with calculations and circuit design.
  • Another participant inquires about the source of the natural frequency equation presented in the initial post.

Areas of Agreement / Disagreement

Participants express differing views on the implications of natural frequencies in relation to sinusoidal forces and the significance of various vibration modes. The discussion remains unresolved regarding the best approach to analyze beams under sinusoidal loading.

Contextual Notes

Some assumptions regarding the nature of the loads and the specific conditions of the beam are not fully articulated, and the discussion does not resolve the complexities involved in analyzing the beam's response to sinusoidal forces.

Who May Find This Useful

Students and professionals in mechanical engineering, particularly those interested in vibrations, structural analysis, and control systems, may find this discussion relevant.

marcas3
Messages
5
Reaction score
0
Hello, I am taking a vibrations course and we are currently talking about using PDEs to find responses of beams. In the book, there is an equation to find the natural frequencies of a simply supported beam under an axial load:

omega = (pi^2/l^2)*sqrt(EI/roA)*sqrt(n^4 + (n^2*P*l^2)/(pi^2*EI))

However, what if the load (P) is not axial but sinusoidal. For example, P = sin(t). How would we find the natural frequencies then. There are other equations to find the natural frequency but none of them talk about beams subjected to sin or cos loads.

Thanks!
 
Engineering news on Phys.org
In mechanical engineering, "natural frequency" usually means the frequency of small amplitude vibrations (or "free vibrations") about a steady state of the structure (independent of time). The equation you give looks like a formula for the frequencies of transverse oscillations of a beam with a constant axial force P applied to it.

The natural frequencies and mode shapes don't tell you the actual motion of the structure in any situation, they only tell you about its possible motions. In particular, they don't tell you anything about the amplitude of the motion.

Calculating the response of a structure to a time varying force with a specific amplitude is a different problem, though some ways to solve it describe the solution as a linear combination of the free vibration modes. You will probably meet that type of problem later on in the course, or you may have already met it in an earlier dynamics course.

If the beam was subject to a sinusoidal axial force (and no other forces) it would move in the axial direction not the transverse direction, so the natural frequencies for transverse vibrations would be irrelevant. The amplitude of the motion would depend on the axial vibration frequences, which are the same the axial vibration of a rod, and are independent of the bending stiffness (or I value) of the beam.

If there were a combination of sinusoidal forces in both the axial and transverse directions, it would be possible to set up the PDE describing the motion but it would be very hard to solve it. In practice you would get the solutions numerically, for example using a finite element model of the structure.
 
So if a mode only tells you about the possible motion of a structure, how do you know which mode best describes the beam's motion? I know that such a vibrating system can have multiple modes but is it possible for some modes to have little or no effect on the response? How do you know which ones are basically useless, if any?
 
marcas3 said:
So if a mode only tells you about the possible motion of a structure, how do you know which mode best describes the beam's motion? I know that such a vibrating system can have multiple modes but is it possible for some modes to have little or no effect on the response? How do you know which ones are basically useless, if any?

You transform the equations of motion to use the mode shapes as generalized variables, which is a very similar procoess to the general ideas behind the Lagrangian formulation of Newtonian mechanics.

The modal equations of motion are nice to work with, since the "modal stiffness" and "modal mass" matrices of the structure are both diagonal. The transformation of forces from the "real world" coordinate system into modal components is intutively simple to visualize. If you apply a force to a point on the structure, the mode shapes which have large displacements at that point respond more than those with small displacements. That makes sense, because work = force x distance, so the force puts more energy into the modes that make the biggest contribution to the displacement at the point where the forcei is applied.

As a special case, if a mode has zero displacement in a particular direction, a force in that direction will not excite it at all. So in your beam example, an axial force applied to the beam can not excite any of the tranverse vibration modes, and similarly a transverse force can't excite any axial vibration modes.
 
hello guys
I am a student of mechanical engg and i have taken instrumentation and control as my elective subject . can any1 please help me with the following question please .. i need to submit this by wednesday 12 / 01 / 2011 .

A beam is vibrating sinusoidal at 40 Hz. The displacement at the centre of the beam is set to 0.60 mm peak-to-peak. A piezoelectric accelerometer attached to the centre of the beam, has a sensitivity of 2.5 V/g and an output impedance of 200 . However, there is a requirement to measure the velocity of the motion at the centre of the beam.

(a) Calculate the output of the accelerometer in Volts rms. (6 marks)

(b) Draw a circuit incorporating an operational amplifier, which will allow a velocity signal to be obtained from the accelerometer signal. (6 marks)

(c) Identify appropriate component values for the velocity measurement system to give a sensitivity of 2 Vs/m. Clearly identify how you arrive at your chosen values.

Your help can be of great use to me .. i ll pass my module if u help me with these guys :)

Thanks ..
 
"In the book, there is an equation to find the natural frequencies of a simply supported beam under an axial load:

omega = (pi^2/l^2)*sqrt(EI/roA)*sqrt(n^4 + (n^2*P*l^2)/(pi^2*EI))"

Which book is this from please?
 

Similar threads

Replies
1
Views
2K
  • · Replies 7 ·
Replies
7
Views
3K
  • · Replies 1 ·
Replies
1
Views
4K
  • · Replies 22 ·
Replies
22
Views
4K
Replies
6
Views
2K
Replies
4
Views
7K
Replies
6
Views
8K
Replies
17
Views
3K
  • · Replies 3 ·
Replies
3
Views
3K
  • · Replies 5 ·
Replies
5
Views
4K