Natural numbers distributive lattice

Click For Summary
SUMMARY

The set of natural numbers, when ordered by the relationship of divisibility, forms a distributive lattice with the greatest common divisor (gcd) functioning as the AND operation and the least common multiple (lcm) as the OR operation. The proof requires demonstrating that a AND (b OR c) is less than or equal to (a AND b) OR (a AND c). This can be established by leveraging properties of gcd and lcm, as discussed in the referenced Math Stack Exchange thread.

PREREQUISITES
  • Understanding of basic number theory concepts, specifically gcd and lcm.
  • Familiarity with lattice theory and its properties.
  • Knowledge of mathematical proofs and inequalities.
  • Experience with mathematical notation and terminology.
NEXT STEPS
  • Study the properties of gcd and lcm in detail.
  • Learn about lattice theory, focusing on distributive lattices.
  • Explore mathematical proof techniques, particularly in number theory.
  • Review the discussion and proofs provided in the Math Stack Exchange thread on natural numbers and divisibility.
USEFUL FOR

Mathematicians, students of number theory, and anyone interested in the properties of divisibility and lattice structures in mathematics.

Xael
Messages
1
Reaction score
0
I need a proof that the set of natural numbers with the the relationship of divisibility form a distributive lattice with gcd as AND and lcm as OR.

I know it can be shown that a AND (b OR c) >= (a AND b) OR (a AND c) for a general lattice, and that if we can show the opposite, that a AND (b OR c) <= (a AND b) OR (a AND c) that implies the two are equal. How do I prove this second part? I am not experienced with number theory, and I have struggled to get a meaningful expression of gcd's and lcm's.

Alternatively, is there a different way you can show me how to prove this?

Thank you!
 
Physics news on Phys.org
If there are an infinite number of natural numbers, and an infinite number of fractions in between any two natural numbers, and an infinite number of fractions in between any two of those fractions, and an infinite number of fractions in between any two of those fractions, and an infinite number of fractions in between any two of those fractions, and... then that must mean that there are not only infinite infinities, but an infinite number of those infinities. and an infinite number of those...

Similar threads

Replies
15
Views
2K
  • · Replies 18 ·
Replies
18
Views
3K
  • · Replies 11 ·
Replies
11
Views
3K
  • · Replies 3 ·
Replies
3
Views
834
  • · Replies 3 ·
Replies
3
Views
2K
Replies
1
Views
2K
  • · Replies 20 ·
Replies
20
Views
3K
  • · Replies 7 ·
Replies
7
Views
2K
  • · Replies 8 ·
Replies
8
Views
2K
  • · Replies 16 ·
Replies
16
Views
2K