- #1

- 1,734

- 13

## Homework Statement

[/B]

(a) Show that for an incompressible flow the velocity potential satisfies ##\nabla^2 \phi = 0##. Show further the relation for the potential to be ## \frac{\partial \phi}{\partial t} + \frac{\nabla \phi \dot \nabla \phi}{2} + \frac{p}{\rho} + gz = const.##

(b)Write out the boundary conditions on velocity and show ##\phi$## is of the form: ## \phi = -\frac{\omega n_0}{k} cos(kx-\omega t) \frac{cosh kz}{sinh kH}## subject to ## \omega^2 = gk \space tanh \space (kH)##

(c) How does the frequency of the waves vary after the boat is gone?

## Homework Equations

## The Attempt at a Solution

__Part (a)__[/B]

For an irrotational flow, ## \nabla \cdot \vec u = 0## so this means that velocity can be written as gradient of some potential ## u = \nabla \phi##.

Therefore ## \nabla \cdot \vec u = \nabla^2 \phi = 0##.

Navier stokes equation is given by:

[tex] \frac{\partial \vec u}{\partial t} + (\vec u \cdot \nabla) \vec u + \frac{1}{\rho} \nabla p + g \vec k = \nu \nabla^2 \vec u [/tex]

Using the identity and ## \nabla^2 \vec u = 0 ##, ## \nabla \times \vec u \times \vec u = 0## I get the answer.

__Part (b)__

The boundary condition is velocity at ##z=0## is zero (non-slip).

I don't think this question wants me to simply substitute the given form of ##\phi## to verify it is right. I am expected to derive it.

Substituting, I get

[tex] Z \frac{\partial X}{\partial t} + \frac{ (Z\nabla X + X \nabla Z) \cdot (Z\nabla X + X \nabla Z) }{2} + \frac{p}{\rho} + gz = const. [/tex]

This leads to nowhere. Any idea how to proceed?