Need closed form for a Binomial series

Click For Summary

Discussion Overview

The discussion revolves around a probability problem involving a random variable ##X## that represents the number of terminals polled until the first ready terminal is located in a system with seven terminals, four of which are ready. Participants explore the values that ##X## can assume, the probability of these values, and seek a closed form for the expected value ##E(X)##. The conversation includes elements of mathematical reasoning and technical explanation.

Discussion Character

  • Exploratory
  • Mathematical reasoning
  • Technical explanation
  • Debate/contested

Main Points Raised

  • Post 1 introduces the problem and asks for guidance on finding a closed form for ##E(X)##.
  • Post 2 corrects a LaTeX formatting issue in the probability expression and reiterates the probability formula for ##P[X = i]## and the summation for ##E(X)##.
  • Post 3 requests assistance with the summation and closed form.
  • Post 4 expresses uncertainty about simplifying the summation and suggests using symbolic math software for experimentation.
  • Post 5 proposes an alternative interpretation of the problem as an absorbing state Markov Chain and provides an approximate expression for ##E[X]##, noting it as an upper bound. It also suggests a tighter bound using a finite geometric series setup.
  • Post 5 points out a typo in the earlier probability expressions, suggesting a correction to the binomial coefficient in the numerator.
  • Post 6 acknowledges the correction regarding the typo and indicates a need to modify the solution based on the clarification provided.

Areas of Agreement / Disagreement

Participants express differing views on the best approach to finding a closed form for ##E(X)##, with some proposing approximations and others focusing on the original summation. There is no consensus on a definitive solution or simplification.

Contextual Notes

Participants note potential issues with the summation and the correctness of the probability expressions, indicating that the probabilities may not sum to one without the suggested corrections.

issacnewton
Messages
1,035
Reaction score
37
Hello
I was solving a problem in probability. Here is the statement.
Seven terminals in an on-line system are attached to a communications line to the central computer. Exactly four of these terminals are ready to transmit a message. Assume that each terminal is equally likely to be in the ready state.Let ##X## be the random variable whose value is the number of terminals polled until the first ready terminal is located.
(a) What values may ##X## assume ?
(b) What is the probability that ##X## will assume each of these values? Assume that terminals are polled in a fixed sequence without repetition.
(c) Suppose the communication line has ##m## terminals attached of which ##n## are ready to transmit. Show that ##X## can assume only the values ##i=1,2,\cdots,m-n+1## with ##P[X =i] = \binom{m-i}[n-i}/\binom{m}{n}##. The problem is from the book Probability, Statistics, and Queueing Theory: With Computer Science Applications by Arnold Allen. The problem can be seen in this google book review. Now I have been able to solve this problem. Though its not asked here, wanted to find the ##E(X)## for case (c). So we would have $$\sum_{i=1}^{m-n+1}i \frac{\binom{m-i}[n-i}} {\binom{m}{n}}$$
I have not been able to get this into some nice closed form. Can anybody provide guidance ? Also there seems to be some problem with the latex command \binom{}{}. Its not working for me.
 
Physics news on Phys.org
IssacNewton said:
Also there seems to be some problem with the latex command \binom{}{}. Its not working for me.
You have a '[' before the n-i that should be a '{'.

$$P[X =i] = \binom{m-i}{n-i}/\binom{m}{n}$$
$$\sum_{i=1}^{m-n+1}i \frac{\binom{m-i}{n-i}} {\binom{m}{n}}$$
 
Last edited:
Thanks FactChecker. So do you have any idea how to do summation here. Any closed form ?
 
IssacNewton said:
Thanks FactChecker. So do you have any idea how to do summation here. Any closed form ?
Nope. I don't see any way to simplify it (other than possibly factoring out the denominator). If I had Maple or something that could do symbolic math, I might experiment a little, but I don't have Maple.
 
IssacNewton said:
Thanks FactChecker. So do you have any idea how to do summation here. Any closed form ?

The problem can instead by interpreted as an absorbing state Markov Chain. Consider using the expression:

##E[X] \approx \frac{m}{n} = \frac{1}{\frac{n}{m}}##

Technically this is an upper bound. If you have a lot of terminals, and a 'semi balanced' mix of working and non-working ones, then this becomes an extremely tight bound that approximates the answer.

If you are concerned with a small number of terminals, you could tighten the bound using a finite geometric series setup where ##p = 1 - \frac{n}{m}##, and ##E[X] \approx \frac{1-p^{m-n+1}}{1-p}## but I find the earlier expression rather nicer, and note that in the limit they are the same.

- - - -
Note the summation and probabilities written by isaacNewton and FactChecker have a typo in it that makes the probabilities not sum to one. It should read:

##\sum_{i=1}^{m-n+1}i \frac{\binom{m-i}{n-1}} {\binom{m}{n}}##

Where we have n - 1 not n - i in the binomial coefficient in the numerator.
 
  • Like
Likes   Reactions: FactChecker
StoneTemplePython, thanks for pointing out the mistake of ##n-i##. Your explanation about the bounds makes sense. I will have to modify my solution now, as I was helping a student.
 

Similar threads

Replies
1
Views
3K
  • · Replies 3 ·
Replies
3
Views
2K
  • · Replies 19 ·
Replies
19
Views
4K
  • · Replies 4 ·
Replies
4
Views
2K
  • · Replies 3 ·
Replies
3
Views
3K
  • · Replies 12 ·
Replies
12
Views
3K
  • · Replies 2 ·
Replies
2
Views
5K
  • · Replies 3 ·
Replies
3
Views
2K
  • · Replies 5 ·
Replies
5
Views
2K
  • · Replies 10 ·
Replies
10
Views
2K