MHB Need Explanations For The Red Part (2 variable inequality)

AI Thread Summary
The discussion focuses on proving the inequality [(x^2 + y^2)/2] >= x + y - 1 for any two numbers x and y. The key argument is based on the fact that the square of any real number is non-negative, leading to the conclusion that (x-1)^2 + (y-1)^2 is also non-negative. This non-negativity implies that the left side of the inequality is greater than or equal to the right side. The participants seek clarification on the reasoning behind the red part of the proof, which hinges on understanding the properties of squares. Overall, the discussion emphasizes the foundational principles of inequalities in algebra.
WannaBe
Messages
11
Reaction score
0
Prove that for any two numbers x,y we have [(x^2 + y^2)/2] >= x + y - 1

Solution)

For any number a we have have a^2 > 0. So,

(x-1)^2 + (y-1)^2 >= 0

And if we solve this we get the solution.I don't get the red part.
 
Mathematics news on Phys.org
Re: Need Explanations For The Red Part

WannaBe said:
Prove that for any two numbers x,y we have [(x^2 + y^2)/2] >= x + y - 1
Solution)
For any number a we have have a^2 > 0. So,
(x-1)^2 + (y-1)^2 >= 0

And if we solve this we get the solution.
If for all $$a$$ we have $$a^2\ge 0$$ then $$(x-1)^2\ge 0~\&~(y-1)^2\ge 0$$.

Add those to together and get $$(x-1)^2+(y-1)^2\ge 0$$
 
Suppose ,instead of the usual x,y coordinate system with an I basis vector along the x -axis and a corresponding j basis vector along the y-axis we instead have a different pair of basis vectors ,call them e and f along their respective axes. I have seen that this is an important subject in maths My question is what physical applications does such a model apply to? I am asking here because I have devoted quite a lot of time in the past to understanding convectors and the dual...
Insights auto threads is broken atm, so I'm manually creating these for new Insight articles. In Dirac’s Principles of Quantum Mechanics published in 1930 he introduced a “convenient notation” he referred to as a “delta function” which he treated as a continuum analog to the discrete Kronecker delta. The Kronecker delta is simply the indexed components of the identity operator in matrix algebra Source: https://www.physicsforums.com/insights/what-exactly-is-diracs-delta-function/ by...
Back
Top