Need help in solving DC transients question (Electrical Engg)

  • Thread starter Thread starter thesidjway
  • Start date Start date
  • Tags Tags
    Dc
Click For Summary

Discussion Overview

The discussion revolves around solving a DC transients problem in electrical engineering, specifically focusing on a circuit involving resistors, capacitors, and inductors. Participants are attempting to determine the general solution for the voltage across the capacitor (Vc) and the current (Ix) in the circuit, while addressing initial conditions and mathematical approaches such as Laplace transforms.

Discussion Character

  • Technical explanation
  • Mathematical reasoning
  • Debate/contested

Main Points Raised

  • Some participants suggest determining initial conditions for the inductor (L) and capacitor (C) as a starting point.
  • There are multiple proposals for solving the circuit, including redrawing it for clarity and identifying parallel components.
  • Several participants mention the use of Laplace transforms as a potentially easier method, while others express concern that the original poster may be focused on differential equations.
  • One participant expresses uncertainty about the differentiation of Vc at t=0+, suggesting a value of -2 V/sec, while others challenge this claim and discuss the implications of a step change in voltage.
  • There are corrections regarding the initial voltage values across the capacitor, with some participants indicating that the original poster's values may be incorrect.
  • One participant mentions using a general equation for the voltage across the capacitor, while others discuss the need for a differential equation approach.

Areas of Agreement / Disagreement

Participants express differing views on the correct approach to solving the problem, with no consensus reached on the initial conditions or the appropriate mathematical methods to apply. Disagreements exist regarding the values of V(0+) and V(0-) as well as the differentiation of Vc at t=0+.

Contextual Notes

There are unresolved assumptions regarding the definitions of voltage across the capacitor and the implications of the step response in the circuit. Some mathematical steps remain unclear, and the discussion reflects a range of interpretations of the circuit's behavior.

thesidjway
Messages
2
Reaction score
0
http://i.imgur.com/nhBN1RJ.jpg << Huge image replaced with URL by Moderator >>

The attempt at a solution

I have been able to find
V(0+)=12
V(0-)=12
I(0-)=4

Not able to find a suitable way to get a general solution for Vc and Ix
 
Last edited by a moderator:
Physics news on Phys.org
This is a tough problem!

First off, like all circuits, redraw it so it doesn't look so intimidating.

Slide the switch a little to the left so it lines up vertically with R1.

Take R3, take it's vertical branches and make them horizontal so they are just above the switch and the inductor.
Clearly R3 and the capacitor are in parallel.

I would also slide the inductor to the bottom horizontal branch. When the switch closes, it is then clear that R3, the capacitor and the inductor are in paralell.

Perhaps that will get you started a bit...
 
1. determine the initial conditions on L and C.
2. sum currents to zero at the right-hand node (only) and you're off.

One unknown node, one equation.
Do you know Laplace transforms? You don't have to, but it helps.
 
rude man said:
1. determine the initial conditions on L and C.
2. sum currents to zero at the right-hand node (only) and you're off.

One unknown node, one equation.
Do you know Laplace transforms? You don't have to, but it helps.

Laplace transforms would definitely be the easy way...but I get the feeling he is in the differential equation part of his studies...also known as the hard way.
 
psparky said:
Laplace transforms would definitely be the easy way...but I get the feeling he is in the differential equation part of his studies...also known as the hard way.

Still only one equation & one unknown node.
 
I hope the answer to differentiation of Vc at t=0+ would be -2V/sec
 
lazyaditya said:
I hope the answer to differentiation of Vc at t=0+ would be -2V/sec

I got infinities for all the t = 0+ derivatives. I'll check it some more later.
 
Last edited:
lazyaditya said:
I hope the answer to differentiation of Vc at t=0+ would be -2V/sec
You hope?

The circuit can be resolved into one comprising 3 parallel elements, R, C, and L, then look up or work out the D.E. for that 2nd order system's step response. That is the only way I can see (or the Laplace equivalent).
 
NascentOxygen said:
You hope?

The circuit can be resolved into one comprising 3 parallel elements, R, C, and L,. ...

,,, plus a fourth element.
 
  • #10
thesidjway said:
http://i.imgur.com/nhBN1RJ.jpg << Huge image replaced with URL by Moderator >>

The attempt at a solution

I have been able to find
V(0+)=12
V(0-)=12
I(0-)=4

Not able to find a suitable way to get a general solution for Vc and Ix

Your V(0+) and V(0-) are wrong. Hint: check sign on Vc(0+). Vc(0-) should be obvious. I assume by Vc is meant the right-hand side of C. If by "V(0+)" and "V(0-)" you just mean the voltage across C then you're OK.
 
Last edited:
  • #11
NascentOxygen said:
You hope?

The circuit can be resolved into one comprising 3 parallel elements, R, C, and L, then look up or work out the D.E. for that 2nd order system's step response. That is the only way I can see (or the Laplace equivalent).
I am sorry. I should have used "I think". I solved the problem roughly using general equation of voltage across capacitor Vc(t)=Vc(final)+[Vc(initial) - Vc(final)]e-t/RC. But after your reduced circuit i solved it in the following manner as per given in figures attached.
 

Attachments

  • photo 3.JPG
    photo 3.JPG
    40.5 KB · Views: 468
  • photo(1).JPG
    photo(1).JPG
    36 KB · Views: 501
  • photo 2(2).JPG
    photo 2(2).JPG
    40.9 KB · Views: 475
  • photo 1(2).JPG
    photo 1(2).JPG
    30.3 KB · Views: 469
  • #12
rude man said:
As usual I can't make out people's writings. But if you still got dvc/dt = -2V/s. that is clearly incorrect. At t = 0+ there is a step change in Vc and the derivative of a step is the delta function which is infini
Vc is marked on the schematic as the voltage across the capacitor plates, by essentially a left-pointing arrow.

Vc(0-) = Vc(0+) = +12V

Immediately the switch is thrown, the current into the capacitor changes from 0 to 2A to the RHS plate, this equates to

dVc(0) /dt = -2 V/s
 
  • #13
NascentOxygen said:
Vc is marked on the schematic as the voltage across the capacitor plates, by essentially a left-pointing arrow.

Vc(0-) = Vc(0+) = +12V

Immediately the switch is thrown, the current into the capacitor changes from 0 to 2A to the RHS plate, this equates to

dVc(0) /dt = -2 V/s

Yes. I was computing the voltge at the right-hand node. Either didn't see the vc as marked or it was added later.

Will look at the rest later, altho' the OP seems to have disappeared as usual.
 
  • #14
lazyaditya said:
I am sorry. I should have used "I think". I solved the problem roughly using general equation of voltage across capacitor Vc(t)=Vc(final)+[Vc(initial) - Vc(final)]e-t/RC. But after your reduced circuit i solved it in the following manner as per given in figures attached.

Are you doing the rest? The OP seems to have gone AWOL.
 

Similar threads

  • · Replies 14 ·
Replies
14
Views
4K
Replies
7
Views
2K
  • · Replies 6 ·
Replies
6
Views
7K
Replies
1
Views
2K
  • · Replies 4 ·
Replies
4
Views
4K
  • · Replies 7 ·
Replies
7
Views
2K
  • · Replies 6 ·
Replies
6
Views
2K
  • · Replies 3 ·
Replies
3
Views
2K
  • · Replies 9 ·
Replies
9
Views
2K
  • · Replies 1 ·
Replies
1
Views
3K