Why Did I Calculate the Cliff's Height Incorrectly?

  • Thread starter Thread starter confusedaboutphysics
  • Start date Start date
Click For Summary
The diver's horizontal speed is 1.2 m/s, and he dives for 3 seconds, leading to a horizontal distance of 3.6 meters from the cliff base. The correct formula for vertical distance is y = -1/2gt², which calculates the cliff's height as 44.1 meters. The initial calculations were reversed, mistakenly stating the cliff height as 3.6 meters and the distance from the base as 44.1 meters. The diver's actual trajectory confirms the cliff is significantly taller than the horizontal distance traveled. Accurate application of the formulas reveals the cliff's height is 44.1 meters, while the diver lands 3.6 meters away.
confusedaboutphysics
Messages
33
Reaction score
0
need help please! what am i doing wrong??

A diver running 1.2 m/s dives out horizontally from the edge of a vertical cliff and reaches the water below 3.0 s later. How high was the cliff and how far from its base did the diver hit the water?

so does v = 1.2 m/s and t=3 seconds
i used the formula Vxo=X/t so i did 1.2=x/3 so x = 3.6m for the first part of the question. for the second part of the question i used the formula y=-1/2gt^2 so i did y=(-1/2)(-9.8)(3^2) = 44.1m.
so i said that the cliff was 3.6m high and the base was 44.1m away. but i got it wrong. am i using the right formulas?
 
Physics news on Phys.org
You got the right formulas but you switched em, he landed 3.6 m away and the cliff was 44.1m high!
 
ohh! thank you so much! it didn't sound right that a cliff was 3.6m high and he hit the water at 44.1m! lol
 
The book claims the answer is that all the magnitudes are the same because "the gravitational force on the penguin is the same". I'm having trouble understanding this. I thought the buoyant force was equal to the weight of the fluid displaced. Weight depends on mass which depends on density. Therefore, due to the differing densities the buoyant force will be different in each case? Is this incorrect?

Similar threads

  • · Replies 4 ·
Replies
4
Views
2K
Replies
7
Views
2K
  • · Replies 1 ·
Replies
1
Views
1K
Replies
1
Views
2K
Replies
12
Views
2K
  • · Replies 15 ·
Replies
15
Views
3K
  • · Replies 9 ·
Replies
9
Views
3K
Replies
5
Views
968
  • · Replies 5 ·
Replies
5
Views
6K
Replies
8
Views
7K