Need help proving some trig identities

Click For Summary

Homework Help Overview

The discussion revolves around proving trigonometric identities, specifically two identities involving secant and sine functions. Participants are exploring various approaches to validate these identities.

Discussion Character

  • Exploratory, Mathematical reasoning, Problem interpretation

Approaches and Questions Raised

  • Participants discuss starting from basic definitions of trigonometric functions, such as replacing secant with its cosine definition. There are attempts to combine fractions and apply Pythagorean identities. Questions arise about whether to combine fractions from the original equation or from intermediate steps.

Discussion Status

Some participants have provided guidance on how to approach the problems, suggesting foundational definitions and methods for combining terms. There is an ongoing exploration of different interpretations and methods without a clear consensus on the final solutions.

Contextual Notes

Participants express uncertainty about the steps taken and seek validation of their reasoning. The discussion reflects a collaborative effort to understand the identities rather than simply finding solutions.

Confusedbrah
Messages
3
Reaction score
0
Proving identities is a pain! Thanks in advance, guys!

Homework Statement



1. 1 + sec^(2)xsin^(2)x = sec^(2)x

2. sinx/1-cosx + sinx/1+cosx = 2cscx

Homework Equations


The Attempt at a Solution



For the first problem, this is the best I got:

1 + sec^(2)x(1-cos(2)x)

For the second problem, I added the fractions together and got:

(sinx + sinxcosx + sinx - sinxcosx) / ((1-cosx) (1-cosx)) =

(2sinx) / (1-cosx) (1+cosx) =

(2sinx) / (1-cos^(2)x) =

(2sinx) / (sin^(2)x)
 
Physics news on Phys.org
Welcome to PF

For the first one, go back to basics and replace sec with its cos definition ie sec(x)=1/cos(x) and it should be apparent.

For the second one, try combining the fractions on the left and also replace csc(x) with its sin(x) definition.
 
  • Like
Likes   Reactions: 1 person
jedishrfu said:
Welcome to PF

For the first one, go back to basics and replace sec with its cos definition ie sec(x)=1/cos(x) and it should be apparent.

For the second one, try combining the fractions on the left and also replace csc(x) with its sin(x) definition.

Hmmm I kinda see what you're saying. I started all over with the first one and this is what I got, can anyone check if I did it correctly? It proves to be correct, at least to me.

1 + (1/cos^(2)x)(sin^(2))x) = I then multiplied the two fractions, giving me:

1 + (sin^(2)x)/(cos^(2)x) = now I combine the fractions, giving me:

(cos^(2)x + sin^(2)x)/(cos^(2)x) = now I apply a Pythagorean identity to the numerator:

(1)/(cos^(2)x) = sec^(2)x


I am still stumped on the second one. Are you saying combine fractions from the initial equation or the one I worked on and got? Thanks
 
Combine the LHS of number 2. Do you see why that is a good idea?
 
verty said:
Combine the LHS of number 2. Do you see why that is a good idea?

I think I got it now. For number 2, I separated the two fractions from the left side of the initial equation and got this:

(sinx)/(1) - (sinx)/(cosx) + (sinx)/(1) +(sinx)/(cosx) = then I combined similar terms and got this:

(sinx)/(1) + (sinx)/(1) = now I flipped the fractions and got this:

(1)/(sinx) + (1)/(sinx) = (2)/(sinx) = 2cscx

Can anyone check if I did it correctly? Thanks
 

Similar threads

  • · Replies 15 ·
Replies
15
Views
3K
  • · Replies 28 ·
Replies
28
Views
5K
Replies
11
Views
36K
  • · Replies 2 ·
Replies
2
Views
4K
  • · Replies 2 ·
Replies
2
Views
2K
  • · Replies 4 ·
Replies
4
Views
2K
  • · Replies 5 ·
Replies
5
Views
5K
Replies
54
Views
4K
  • · Replies 6 ·
Replies
6
Views
3K
  • · Replies 2 ·
Replies
2
Views
4K