Recently I review some old text and browse around the internet to read about definition of strain and stress. I come across the following document(adsbygoogle = window.adsbygoogle || []).push({});

http://web.mit.edu/emech/dontindex-build/full-text/emechbk_4.pdf

Previously I have been facing difficulty trying to come out with an explanation of what it means by strain as a point property in a solid continuum. I knew there is formal explanation and definition out there, but they are hard to visualize (to me at least). This MIT document has inspire me to think of something and I wish to get some verification on the thought, whether it is valid or not, if not, why.

The objective is to explain what it means by strain in a general solid continuum, where the shape is not simple geometry, no well define length width and height, hence one just can not get an original length to divide the elongation when the object is under load. Beyond that, is to try to show that, at different point in a solid continuum, there can be a strain exists there, though it might be constant throughout the solid in simple case.

Imagine a load case as illustrate above in the picture. The arbitrarily solid is being fix at the thick black line. An arbitrarily force is applied at the other end. It can be any direction, but for simplicity I only take the x-direction. Now we can choose any point in the solid, which has x-coordinate x.

The displacement of this point due to load along x-direction is indicated as [itex]u_{x}[/itex].

Then the strain of this point along x-direction, [itex]\epsilon_{x}[/itex] is equals to

[itex]\epsilon_{x}[/itex] = [itex]\frac{du_{x}}{dx}[/itex]

i.e. strain is the rate of change of point displacement with respect to position.

In this way one can see every point (different x) will have a strain. There is no need to bother about the original length (we cannot find it any way, is an arbitrarily shape solid).

Remark: you can immediately see that this is just a copy and paste of the demonstration in the MIT document at section 4.6.

Any mistake here?

I remember true strain being defined as

[itex]d\epsilon=\frac{dl}{l}[/itex] , where l is the length of object. It looks different than my equation. So I think maybe I made mistake?

Lousy drawing using Microsoft Word, please bear with me on that.

**Physics Forums - The Fusion of Science and Community**

The friendliest, high quality science and math community on the planet! Everyone who loves science is here!

# Need help to verify an attempt to explain strain as point property

Loading...

Similar Threads - Need help verify | Date |
---|---|

Need Help Calculating what Motor and Gearbox I need (building myself a Trommel) | May 6, 2017 |

I need help with matlab designing a steady state feedback H2 control system | Apr 29, 2017 |

Automotive Motorcycle engine build plan help needed | Apr 24, 2017 |

Automotive Kayak Loader (need help) | Jan 30, 2017 |

Aerospace Need Help with Drones | Jan 21, 2017 |

**Physics Forums - The Fusion of Science and Community**