Need help understanding time dilation

annms
Messages
15
Reaction score
3
I keep reading that an observer will find the clock moving relative to him to be slower than his own local clock. But isn't his own local clock measuring proper time, which should be a shorter time period than the moving clock? How can the slower (moving) clock measure a longer time period? Isn't that a contradiction? I'm so confused please help.
 
Physics news on Phys.org
annms said:
I keep reading that an observer will find the clock moving relative to him to be slower than his own local clock.
Right.
But isn't his own local clock measuring proper time, which should be a shorter time period than the moving clock?
Proper time between what events?
How can the slower (moving) clock measure a longer time period?
A slower clock measures less time between events, of course.

If the 'events' are the ticks of the moving clock, then it is the moving clock that measures the proper time between them. Not you! (Your clocks measure proper time between events that occur at your location.)

Say you are observing a rocket speeding by. The rocket has a clock that is set to flash a burst of light every time a minute passes. You, using your own Earth clocks, would say that the time between flashes was greater than one minute and thus you would describe the moving clock on the rocket as running slow. Since the flashes take place at the location of the moving clock, that clock measures the proper time between them.
 
Last edited:
Thanks. I think I'm getting it a little better.

This was what really confused me: Let's say a spaceship is traveling at a speed near c relative to earth. If one hour has elapsed according to an Earth observer's clock, how much will have elapsed in the spaceship's clock according to the Earth observer? (ie. greater than one hour or less than one hour?) And why?
 
annms said:
If one hour has elapsed according to an Earth observer's clock, how much will have elapsed in the spaceship's clock according to the Earth observer? (ie. greater than one hour or less than one hour?)
The Earth observer would say that during the one hour on earth, less than an hour would have elapsed on the spaceship clock.
And why?
Moving clocks run slowly.
 
Annms:

What do you think the rapidly moving spaceship observer will say about the elapsed time he observes on earth??

Hint: who is moving rapidly now??
 
OK, so this has bugged me for a while about the equivalence principle and the black hole information paradox. If black holes "evaporate" via Hawking radiation, then they cannot exist forever. So, from my external perspective, watching the person fall in, they slow down, freeze, and redshift to "nothing," but never cross the event horizon. Does the equivalence principle say my perspective is valid? If it does, is it possible that that person really never crossed the event horizon? The...
In this video I can see a person walking around lines of curvature on a sphere with an arrow strapped to his waist. His task is to keep the arrow pointed in the same direction How does he do this ? Does he use a reference point like the stars? (that only move very slowly) If that is how he keeps the arrow pointing in the same direction, is that equivalent to saying that he orients the arrow wrt the 3d space that the sphere is embedded in? So ,although one refers to intrinsic curvature...
ASSUMPTIONS 1. Two identical clocks A and B in the same inertial frame are stationary relative to each other a fixed distance L apart. Time passes at the same rate for both. 2. Both clocks are able to send/receive light signals and to write/read the send/receive times into signals. 3. The speed of light is anisotropic. METHOD 1. At time t[A1] and time t[B1], clock A sends a light signal to clock B. The clock B time is unknown to A. 2. Clock B receives the signal from A at time t[B2] and...

Similar threads

Replies
88
Views
7K
Replies
16
Views
2K
Replies
45
Views
5K
Replies
9
Views
355
Replies
54
Views
3K
Replies
18
Views
1K
Replies
46
Views
4K
Back
Top